Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Wedtgrube, A.a | Bockisch, C.J.a; b; c; d; e | Tarnutzer, A.A.a; d; e; f; *
Affiliations: [a] Department of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland | [b] Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland | [c] Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland | [d] Faculty of Medicine, University of Zurich, Switzerland | [e] Center of Clinical Neurosciences, University Hospital Zurich, Switzerland | [f] Cantonal Hospital of Baden, Baden, Switzerland
Correspondence: [*] Corresponding author: A.A. Tarnutzer, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich, Frauenklinikstrasse 26, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland. Tel.: +41 44 255 1111; Fax: +41 44 255 4380; E-mail: alexander.tarnutzer@access.uzh.ch.
Abstract: BACKGROUND:While verticality perception is normally accurate when upright, a systematic bias (“post-tilt bias”) is seen after prolonged roll-tilt. The source of the bias could either be central (shifting “null” position) or related to changes in torsional eye-position. OBJECTIVE:To study the mechanisms of the post-tilt bias in vision-dependent and vision-independent paradigms and to characterize the impact of optokinetic stimulation. METHODS:The subjective visual-vertical (SVV) and subjective haptic-vertical (SHV) were measured after static roll-tilt (±90deg ear-down (“adaptation”) position; duration = 5 min; n = 9 subjects). To assess the effect of visual stimuli, a control condition (darkness) was compared with an optokinetic stimulus (clockwise/counter-clockwise rotation, 60deg/sec) during adaptation. RESULTS:A significant post-tilt bias was more frequent for the SVV than the SHV (72% vs. 54%, p = 0.007) with shifts pointing towards or away from the adaptation position with similar frequency. Exponential-decay time-constants were comparable for both paradigms and directions of shifts. The optokinetic stimulus had no effect on the bias for either paradigm. CONCLUSIONS:Emerging in both vision-dependent and vision-independent paradigms, the results support the hypothesis that the post-tilt bias results from a shift in the internal estimate of direction of gravity, while optokinetic nystagmus seems not to be a major contributor.
Keywords: Perception, multisensory integration, subjective visual vertical, subjective haptic vertical, vestibular
DOI: 10.3233/VES-200690
Journal: Journal of Vestibular Research, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 1-16, 2020
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
sales@iospress.com
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
info@iospress.nl
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office info@iospress.nl
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
china@iospress.cn
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: editorial@iospress.nl