Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Lindahl, Marianne* | Teljigović, Sanel | Heegaard Jensen, Lars | Hvalsoe, Berit | Juneja, Hemant
Affiliations: University College Zealand, Naestved, Denmark
Correspondence: [*] Address for correspondence: Marianne Lindahl, Ass. Professor, Physiotherapy Education, University College Zealand, Campus Naestved, Parkvej 190, 4700 Naestved, Denmark. Tel.: +45 7248 2691; Fax: +45 7248 1001; E-mail: mli@ucsj.dk.
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Quality in rehabilitation is important for recovery and return to work for people at working age, who sustain fractures, but there is limited information about what constitutes quality in rehabilitation. OBJECTIVE: To identify factors that therapists and patients define as quality in the rehabilitation process for working population after simple or multiple fractures. METHODS: The study is a qualitative study based on grounded theory approach with semi-structured interviews conducted individually or in focus groups. Seven patients with fractures, 15 physiotherapists and eight occupational therapists from hospitals, municipalities and private practice were included in the study. Grounded theory was used to analyze data and develop a theory about quality in the rehabilitation process. RESULTS: Partnership was identified as the core category with continuity of rehabilitation and patient-centred approach as its dimensions. Themes in the patient-centred approach were Biopsychosocial understanding and Professionalism. The patient’s perceived control enhanced when the therapist addressed the whole situation, especially return to work. Therapist’s individual considerations and patient’s involvement in decisions about the therapeutic methods had the same effect. CONCLUSION: Quality in rehabilitation was enhanced in all its dimensions namely structure, process and outcome when therapists used the patient-centred approach and addressed the patient’s overall situation.
Keywords: Physical therapy, occupational therapy, qualitative research, return to work, occupation
DOI: 10.3233/WOR-162446
Journal: Work, vol. 55, no. 4, pp. 831-839, 2016
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
sales@iospress.com
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
info@iospress.nl
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office info@iospress.nl
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
china@iospress.cn
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: editorial@iospress.nl