Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Salmani Nodooshan, H.a | Koohi Booshehri, S.a | Daneshmandi, H.b | Choobineh, A.R.c; *
Affiliations: [a] Student Research Committee, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences/Department of Ergonomics, School of Health, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran | [b] Department of Ergonomics, School of Health, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran | [c] Research Center for Health Sciences, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
Correspondence: [*] Address for correspondence: A.R. Choobineh, Research Center for Health Sciences, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, P.O. Box: 71645-111, Shiraz, Iran. Tel.: +98 917 118 4450; Fax: +98 711 7260225; E-mail: alrchoobin@sums.ac.ir.
Abstract: BACKGROUND: In Iranian orthotic and prosthetic workshops, the majority of activities are carried out by manpower and the tasks are labor-intensive. In these workshops, ergonomic aspects of working conditions are seldom considered. OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted in orthotic and prosthetic workshops with the objectives of determination of prevalence rate of MSDs among employees and assessment of ergonomics working conditions. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, all employees (n = 42; 29 males and 13 females) in 11 active orthotic and prosthetic production centers of Shiraz city participated. Data were collected using Nordic Musculoskeletal disorders Questionnaire (NMQ) and observational technique by an ergonomics checklist for assessment of working conditions. RESULTS: The means (SD) of age and job tenure (years) in the study individuals were 37.26 (10.21) and 12.8 (9.39), respectively. The most prevalent MSD symptoms in the past 12 months were reported in the lower back (42.9%), shoulders (40.5%) and knees (40.5%). Working conditions assessment showed that the main ergonomic problems in the workshops studied originated from awkward working posture, improper workstation design, poorly designed hand tools and incorrect manual material handling. CONCLUSION: Any interventional program for working conditions improvement should, therefore, focus on these areas.
Keywords: Musculoskeletal disorders, ergonomics assessment, orthosis and prosthesis
DOI: 10.3233/WOR-162401
Journal: Work, vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 463-470, 2016
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
sales@iospress.com
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
info@iospress.nl
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office info@iospress.nl
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
china@iospress.cn
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: editorial@iospress.nl