Affiliations: [a]
School of Architecture, School of Architecture & Built Environment, The Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden
| [b]
The Stress Research Institute, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden Tel.: +46 73 255 78 58; E-mail: christina.bodin.danielsson@arch.kth.se; christina.bodin.danielsson@su.se
Abstract: BACKGROUND: The workplace is important for employees’ daily life and well-being. This article investigates exploratory the office design’s role for employees’ welfare from different perspectives. OBJECTIVE: By comparing different studies of the office, type’s influence on different factors of employees’ welfare the aim is to see if any common patterns exist in office design’s impact. METHODS: The three included studies investigate office type’s association with employees’ welfare by measuring its influence on: a) perception of leadership, b) sick leave, and c) job satisfaction. The sample consists of office employees from a large, national representative work environment survey that work in one of the seven identified office types in contemporary office design: (1) cell-offices; (2) shared-room offices; (3) small, (4) medium-sized and (5) large open-plan offices; (6) flex-offices and (7) combi-offices. Statistical method used is multivariate logistic and linear regression analysis with adjustment for background factors. RESULTS: Overall results show that shared-room office, traditional open plan offices and flex-office stand out negatively, but to different degree(s) on the different outcomes measured. CONCLUSIONS: This explorative comparison of different studies finds a pattern of office types that repeatedly show indications of negative influence on employees’ welfare, but further studies are needed to clarify this.
Keywords: Office type, sick leave, leadership, job satisfaction, design features
