Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Issue title: Special Section: Complimentary Medicine for Work, Function and Health
Guest editors: Valerie J. Berg Rice
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Wickstrom, Ricka; * | Wang, Ingab
Affiliations: [a] WorkAbility Systems, Inc., West Chester, OH, USA | [b] School of Rehabilitation Sciences & Technology, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI, USA
Correspondence: [*] Address for correspondence: Rick Wickstrom, PT, DPT, WorkAbility Systems, Inc., West Chester, OH, USA. Tel.: +1 513 772 1026; Fax: +1 513 672 2552; E-mail: rick@workability.us.
Abstract: BACKGROUND:The Active Movement Scale (AMS) is a brief screen for identifying movement impairments affecting functional task performance. OBJECTIVE:To assess inter-rater reliability, test-retest reliability, floor and ceiling effects, and concurrent validity of the AMS in adults with musculoskeletal disorders. METHODS:Fifty-five subjects (mean age: 61.3±15.3 years) transitioning from physical therapy attended two sessions. The 14-item AMS was assessed by two therapists, resulting in a total score (AMST) and two sub-scores: upper body (AMSU) and lower body (AMSL). Moreover, subjects completed PROMIS Physical Function-10a (PPF), Lifestyle Physical Function (LPF), Cardio Activity Level (CAL) surveys, Two Square Agility Test (TSAT), WorkAbility Rate of Manipulation Turning (WRMT) and Placing (WRMP), Grip Strength (GS), 10-Meter Walk Usual (GSU) and Fast (GSF) pace, and Grooved Pegboard Placing (GPP) and Remove (GPR) tests. RESULTS:Inter-rater reliability coefficients for AMST, AMSU, and AMSL were 0.96, 0.92, and 0.96, respectively, with individual item reliability ranging from 0.58 to 1.0. Test-retest reliability for these assessments yielded coefficients of 0.93, 0.84, and 0.94, with individual item reliability ranging from 0.47 to 0.88. No floor effects were observed, but mild ceiling effects were noted. AMST showed a high correlation with LPF (r = 0.72) and moderate correlation with PPF (r = 0.64) surveys. AMSU had moderate correlations with GPP (r = 0.61) and WRMP (r = 0.57) tests, while AMSL correlated moderately with GSF (r = 0.55) and TSAT (r = 0.50) tests. CONCLUSIONS:This study provides evidence of the reliability and validity of AMS in adults with musculoskeletal disorders to support transitions between rehabilitation and fitness programs.
Keywords: Movement, dyskinesias, functional status, exercise, rehabilitation, physical fitness, musculoskeletal system
DOI: 10.3233/WOR-230626
Journal: Work, vol. 78, no. 4, pp. 1173-1186, 2024
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
sales@iospress.com
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
info@iospress.nl
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office info@iospress.nl
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
china@iospress.cn
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: editorial@iospress.nl