Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Rezvanizadeh, Majida; 1 | Mohammad-Ghasemi, Mostafaa; 2 | Soltanzadeh, Ahmadb; 3 | Sadeghi-Yarandi, Mohsena; *
Affiliations: [a] MAPNA Group, TUGA, Tehran, Iran | [b] Department of Occupational Safety and Health Engineering, Faculty of Health, Research Center for Environmental Pollutants, Qom University of Medical Sciences, Qom, Iran
Correspondence: [*] Address for correspondence: Mohsen Sadeghi-Yarandi, MAPNA Group, TUGA, Tehran, Iran. Tel.: +989120872898, P.O. Box: 31757-19843; E-mail: M-Sadeghiy@Alumnus.tums.ac.ir; ORCID: 0000-0002-2512-8591.
Note: [1] ORCID: 0000-0002-2108-7817
Note: [2] ORCID: 0000-0001-8365-0903
Note: [3] ORCID: 0000-0002-6976-1276
Abstract: BACKGROUND:Conducting practical studies in ergonomics requires attention to all aspects of ergonomics with a comprehensive approach and focus on continuous improvement cycles. OBJECTIVE:This study aimed to develop and present an ergonomics management model in the workplace. METHODS:This study was performed using a three-stage Delphi study with 30 experts and a fuzzy analytical hierarchy process. According to the literature review and experts’ opinions, the general cycle of the ergonomics management system with eight steps was developed. New methods were formed in two of these eight steps: the 3rd step (developing an ergonomic evaluation method) and the 5th step (creating a cost-benefit evaluation method). RESULTS:The eight implementation steps of the TEMA were determined as follows: 1) Performing task analysis (TTA), 2) Ergonomic hazard identification, 3) Estimating the ergonomic index, 4) Determining control measures, 5) Evaluating cost-benefit parameter, 6) Implementing control measures, 7) Continuous monitoring, and 8) Evaluating the effectiveness of control measures. The Delphi study revealed that the number of deleted parameters includes one item (burnout), and the remaining parameters were 16 items. The mean CVI and CVR values were 0.92 and 0.80, respectively. Cronbach’s alpha values for each of the physical, environmental, and cognitive components and the entire model were 0.91, 0.87, 0.85, and 0.89, respectively. CONCLUSION:Using the mentioned management model can be a practical step towards properly evaluating the most critical dimensions of ergonomics in the workplace and optimal planning to implement control measures to establish a dynamic management system to reduce ergonomic risk factors in the workplace.
Keywords: Keywords: TEMA model, ergonomic risk index, ergonomic assessment, physical ergonomics, cognitive ergonomics, FAHP
DOI: 10.3233/WOR-220251
Journal: Work, vol. 76, no. 1, pp. 205-224, 2023
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
sales@iospress.com
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
info@iospress.nl
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office info@iospress.nl
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
china@iospress.cn
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: editorial@iospress.nl