Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Salik Sengul, Yesima | Yilmaz, Alevb | Kirmizi, Mugec | Kahraman, Turhanc | Kalemci, Orhand
Affiliations: [a] School of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, Dokuz Eylul University, Balcova, Izmir, Turkey | [b] Graduate School of Health Sciences, Dokuz Eylul University, Balcova, Izmir, Turkey | [c] Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Sciences, Izmir Katip Celebi University, Cigli, Izmir, Turkey | [d] Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Dokuz Eylul University, Balcova, Izmir, Turkey
Correspondence: [*] Address for correspondence: Muge Kirmizi, M.Sc. (P.T.), Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Izmir Katip Celebi University, Cigli, Izmir, Turkey. Tel.: +90 5056013348; Fax: +90 2324124946; E-mail: mugekirmizi@hotmail.com.
Abstract: BACKGROUND:Many studies have emphasized the importance of stabilization exercises (SE) for the management of non-specific low back pain (NSLBP), yet there is no study assessing all aspects of core stability in comparing SE and other exercises. OBJECTIVE:To investigate the effects of SE on pain and core stability by using core stability tests that focus on all aspects of core stability in patients with NSLBP. METHODS:Thirty-seven individuals with chronic NSLBP were randomly divided into two groups as SE and conventional exercises (CE). Both groups underwent the progressive exercise program three days per week for six weeks. The assessments were conducted before and after the exercise programs. The outcome measures included pain, disability, trunk strength, trunk flexor, extensor and lateral flexor endurance, function, flexibility, and motor control during eyes open/closed. RESULTS:All assessment parameters except motor control during eyes open improved after SE (p < 0.05). Also, all assessment parameters except motor control during eyes open/closed and lateral trunk endurance improved after CE (p < 0.05). When comparing groups for gain scores, there were more significant improvements in pain during activity, endurance and function after SE (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS:SE is more effective than CE in reducing pain during activity and improving core stability regarding functionality and endurance.
Keywords: Lumbar pain, management of spinal pain, chronic pain, core muscles, spinal stabilization
DOI: 10.3233/WOR-213557
Journal: Work, vol. 70, no. 1, pp. 99-107, 2021
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
sales@iospress.com
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
info@iospress.nl
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office info@iospress.nl
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
china@iospress.cn
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: editorial@iospress.nl