Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Short, Nathana | Almonroeder, Thomasb | Baumle, Madelinec | Benvenuti, Katelync | Bozett, Nataliec | John, Oliviac | Lovasko, Molliec | Rinaldi, Emilyc
Affiliations: [a] Huntington University, Fort Wayne, IN, USA | [b] University of Wisconsin – La Crosse, La Crosse, WI, USA | [c] OTDS, Huntington University, Fort Wayne, IN, USA
Correspondence: [*] Address for correspondence: Nathan Short, PhD, OTD, OTR/L, CHT, Associate Professor of Occupational Therapy, Huntington University, 1819 Carew St., Fort Wayne, IN, USA. E-mail: nathan.short@huntington.edu.
Abstract: BACKGROUND:Wrist pressure and angulation while working at a computer workstation have been associated with cumulative trauma disorders (CTDs) like carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). OBJECTIVE:This quantitative, comparative study analyzed wrist pressure and angulation between two common wrist supports while typing at a standardized computer workstation. METHODS:A convenience sample of healthy young adults completed a five-minute typing task at a standardized workstation with no wrist support, with the ErgoBeads™ wrist support, and with an Elzo™ (memory foam) wrist support. Pressure mapping (Tekscan™)) and goniometry were used as quantitative measures to examine wrist pressure and wrist angulation during the typing task; descriptive and inferential statistics were performed to compare wrist angulation and wrist pressure between two supports. RESULTS:For the sample (n = 54), both wrist supports demonstrated a significant (p < 0.001) reduction in wrist extension as well as pressure compared to typing at the workstation with no support. There was no statistically significant difference in peak or mean pressure between the ErgoBeads™ and Elzo™ wrist supports (p = 0.99). Significant difference was identified ((p < 0.001) for wrist angle as participants exhibited less wrist extension using the ErgoBeads™ ( x¯=12.56∘ ; SD = 3.32°) support as compared to the Elzo™ ( x¯=19.25∘ ; SD = 3.77°) support. CONCLUSIONS:The results suggest that the ErgoBeads™ and Elzo™ memory foam wrist supports are effective for reducing pressure between the wrist and work surface while the ErgoBeads™ support may promote a more neutral angle of the wrist while typing.
Keywords: Computer workstation, keyboarding, wrist support, cumulative trauma disorders (CTD), prevention
DOI: 10.3233/WOR-205154
Journal: Work, vol. 71, no. 4, pp. 1121-1128, 2022
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
sales@iospress.com
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
info@iospress.nl
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office info@iospress.nl
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
china@iospress.cn
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: editorial@iospress.nl