Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Boyle, Eleanora; b; * | Cassidy, J. Davida; b | Côté, Pierreb; c; d
Affiliations: [a] Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark | [b] Division of Epidemiology, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada | [c] Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT), Oshawa, Canada | [d] UOIT-CMCC Centre for the Study of Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, Oshawa, Canada
Correspondence: [*] Correspondence to: Dr Eleanor Boyle, University of Southern Denmark, Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, Campusvej 55, DK-5230 Odense M, Denmark. Tel.: +45 6550 3488; E-mail: eboyle@health.sdu.dk.
Abstract: BACKGROUND:In occupational rehabilitation programs, return-to-work is a key outcome measure; however, the studies either used different definitions for return-to-work or do not provide their definition. In order to provide a solution to this issue, we developed a self-report return-to-work measure. OBJECTIVE:We investigated the reliability and validity of a self-report return-to-work questionnaire in a cohort of workers with a work-related injury. METHODS:Two research assistants independently administered the baseline questionnaires and a follow-up questionnaire. The questionnaires contained work-related questions (e.g., currently working, if duties changed) that were used to create a four-category work status measure. Pain-related and a recovery questions were also asked. We obtained loss of earnings data from the compensation board. The short-term reliability and convergent validity were assessed. RESULTS:We recruited 75 workers, and 57 completed the test-re-test baseline questionnaire, and 51 completed the follow-up. The mean age was 45.4 years and 57% were female. The participants had a mixture of musculoskeletal injuries. Most were in the acute stage, but 17% of the participants were injured for more than a year. The short-term reliability of current working status had a kappa value of 0.90. Participants who were not working had higher levels of pain-related disability than those who were working. The kappa value for the agreement between self-reported working status and administrative data on receiving any loss of earnings payment was around 0.65. CONCLUSIONS:Our study provides evidence of reliability and validity for a new return-to-work measure.
Keywords: Return-to-work, occupational injury, questionnaire, measurement properties, self-report measure, workers’compensation data
DOI: 10.3233/WOR-192909
Journal: Work, vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 69-80, 2019
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
sales@iospress.com
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
info@iospress.nl
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office info@iospress.nl
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
china@iospress.cn
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: editorial@iospress.nl