Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Carrieri, L. | Sgaramella, T.M. | Bortolon, F. | Stenta, G. | Fornaro, L. | Cracco, A. | Perini, F. | Soresi, S.
Affiliations: Dipartimento di Scienze Filosofiche, Università di Cassino, Cassino, Italy | Dipartimento di Psicologia dello Sviluppo e della Socializzazione, Università di Padova, Padova, Italy | Divisione di Neurologia, Ospedale Civile S. Bortolo, Vicenza, Italy | Centro Sclerosi Multipla e Continuità Assistenziale Neurologica, Ospedale S. Bortolo, Vicenza, Italy | Servizio di Psicologia, Ospedale Civile S. Bortolo, Vicenza, Italy
Note: [] Address for correspondence: Teresa Maria Sgaramella, Dipartimento di Psicologia dello Sviluppo e della Socializzazione, Università degli Studi di Padova, Via Belzoni, 80 35137 Padova, Italy. Tel.: +39 827 8458; E-mail: teresamaria.sgaramella@unipd.it
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Literature has shown that work maintenance is central in order to guarantee participation to persons with disability. Knowledge about potential sources of difficulties and obstacles is then crucial in order to prevent barriers and facilitate work maintenance and career development for persons with disabilities. OBJECTIVE: Studies analyzing on-the-job barriers among employed people with multiple sclerosis (MS) have found evidence for a role of clinical determinants. The aim of this study was to describe in more detail the role of disability severity and of cognitive indices on work barriers. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-two employed adults with a diagnosis of MS with mild to moderate disability severity were included in the study. They were involved in the descriptive study while attending their planned care in the MS unit. METHODS: Subjects completed neurocognitive tasks, a self-report measure of executive functioning and a face-to-face semi-structured interview exploring their perception of barriers at work. RESULTS: Regression analyses showed a specific role of disability severity on perception of barriers due to physical, cognitive and interpersonal relationships; cognitive indices, on the other hand, predicted barriers ascribed to company policy (cognitive score), to accessibility (planning score) or difficulties in cognitive and task related abilities (self-rated executive functioning). CONCLUSION: These findings underline the relevance of objective tasks and self-report questionnaire, direct and indirect multi-dimensional assessment of functioning for an early intervention planning. An ecological model of career development in adults with disabilities is also supported.
Keywords: Progressive disability, workplace barriers, predictors
DOI: 10.3233/WOR-131623
Journal: Work, vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 509-520, 2014
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
sales@iospress.com
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
info@iospress.nl
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office info@iospress.nl
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
china@iospress.cn
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: editorial@iospress.nl