Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Keeley, Robert | Atagi, Tanya | Sabelman, Eric | Padilla, Jose | Kadlcik, Paula | Agras, Jean | Eng, Lawrence | Wiedman, Tien-Wen | Nguyen, Khoi | Sudekum, Anthony | Rosen, Joseph
Affiliations: Stanford Medical School, Department of Functional Restoration, NC-104 Hoover Pavilion, Stanford, CA 94305 (USA) | Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Rehabilitation, Research, and Development Center, 3801 Miranda Avenue, 640/153, Palo Alto, CA 94304 (USA) | Dartmouth Medical School and Veterans Affairs M&ROC, Research Service 405/151, White River Junction, VT 05009 (USA)
Note: [] Correspondence: R. Keeley, Stanford Medical School, Department of Functional Restoration, NC-104 Hoover Pavilion, Stanford, CA 94305, USA. Fax: (l)(415)725 6605.
Abstract: Current methods of peripheral nerve repair are to directly suture cut nerve stumps, or to bridge large gaps with an autograft repair. Autograft-associated problems include donor site morbidity and limited supply. Many of the present limitations of nerve repair might be overcome by expanding the patients own Schwann cells in vitro, then combining the cells with other neuro-tropic and -trophic materials into an Artificial Nerve Graft (ANG) for bridging a nerve gap. In this 4.5 month experiment, a rat peroneal nerve model with a 10 mm gap was used to evaluate the effect of live Schwann cells on peripheral nerve regeneration. Nerve gaps were repaired with cellular ANGs containing live Schwann cell, dead Schwann cell, or mixed fibroblast/Schwann cell populations suspended in a collagen I matrix, and with sutured autografts or ANGs containing just collagen or medium. Regenerated nerves were evaluated by walking track analysis, qualitative and quantitative histology, and electrophysiology. Overall, the autograft was the best repair method, while the ANG containing live Schwann cells was statistically superior to other ANG repair methods. This study demonstrates that an ANG containing cultured syngeneic Schwann cells improves functional, histological, and electrophysiological parameters of peripheral nerve regeneration.
Keywords: Schwann cell, Collagen type I, Biopolymer, Artificial nerve graft (ANG), Sutured autograft, Peripheral nerve repair, Nerve regeneration
DOI: 10.3233/RNN-1993-55606
Journal: Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience, vol. 5, no. 5-6, pp. 353-366, 1993
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
sales@iospress.com
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
info@iospress.nl
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office info@iospress.nl
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
china@iospress.cn
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: editorial@iospress.nl