Post-mortem distribution of Iodinated Contrast Media (ICM) (iodixanol versus iopromide) in the porcine kidney after multiple bolus injections in vivo into the supra-renal aorta1
Affiliations: [a] Institute of Biotechnology, Molecular Cell Biology, Brandenburg University of Technology, Senftenberg, Germany
| [b] Department of Plastic and Hand Surgery, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| [c] Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Hospital Braunschweig, Braunschweig, Germany
| [d] Department of Radiology and Interdisciplinary Ultrasound Department, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| [e] Fraunhofer Institute for Applied Polymer Research (IAP), Potsdam-Golm, Germany
| [f] Department of Biomaterials, Central Institute for Biomedical Engineering, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
Correspondence:
[*]
Corresponding author: L. Prantl, Department of Plastic and Hand Surgery, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany. E-mail: Lukas.Prantl@klinik.uni-regensburg.de.
Note: [1] This article was presented at the 40th Conference of the German Society for Clinical Microcirculation and Hemorheology (DGKMH), Senftenberg, Germany, 20–21 May 2022.
Abstract: Iodinated contrast media (ICM) are widely used for diagnostic and interventional procedures in radiology and cardiology. Ideally, they should not interact with blood cells or vascular wall cells to avoid deteriorations of the blood circulation. However, it is well known that ICM can affect erythrocytes as well as endothelial cells which consequently might perturb especially the microcirculation. In former studies the influence of two ICM (iodixanol versus iopromide) on the vascular system, the development of blood stasis, on changes in renal resistive index (RRI) and vascular diameters, and on the post-mortem distribution of iodine as marker for ICM in the explanted kidneys was examined. The modus of ICM application into the supra-renal aorta followed the regime in interventional cardiology, so that 10 bolus injections were administered at steady intervals (iopromide 4,32 ml / iodixanol 5 ml) accompanied by infusion of 500 ml isotonic NaCl-solution. In the present study, the post-mortem X-ray analysis revealed that there were no differences in iodine content in the regions of the mid-cortex and the medullo-pelvic transition zone of the kidneys after application of both ICM. Remarkable differences, however, were found in the region of the capsule-near cortex, where the application of iopromide led to a significantly lower iodine content in the microcirculation. This is in good agreement with former studies, in which a maldistribution in this area, presumably due to a decrease in arteriolar inflow as a result of stasis/occlusion was shown.
