Deep learning radiomics of ultrasonography for differentiating sclerosing adenosis from breast cancer

Article type: Research Article

Authors: Li, Chunxiao^{a; 1} | Zhang, Huili^{b; 1} | Chen, Jing^a | Shao, Sihui^a | Li, Xin^a | Yao, Minghua^a | Zheng, Yi^a | Wu, Rong^{a; *} | Shi, Jun^{b; *}

Affiliations: [a] Department of Ultra sound, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Hongkou District, Shanghai, China | [b] School of Communication and Information Engineering, Shanghai University, Baoshan District, Shanghai, China

Correspondence: [*] Corresponding authors: Jun Shi and Rong Wu. E-mails: junshi@shu.edu.cn; wurong7111@163.com.

Note: [1] Chunxiao Li and Huili Zhang contributed equally to this work and are co-first authors.

Abstract: OBJECTIVES:The purpose of our study is to present a method combining radiomics with deep learning and clinical data for improved differential diagnosis of sclerosing adenosis (SA)and breast cancer (BC). METHODS:A total of 97 patients with SA and 100 patients with BC were included in this study. The best model for classification was selected from among four different convolutional neural network (CNN) models, including Vgg16, Resnet18, Resnet50, and Desenet121. The intra-/inter-class correlation coefficient and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator method were used for radiomics feature selection. The clinical features selected were patient age and nodule size. The overall accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, Youden index, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and area under curve (AUC) value were calculated for comparison of diagnostic efficacy. RESULTS:All the CNN models combined with radiomics and clinical data were significantly superior to CNN models only. The Desenet121+radiomics+clinical data model showed the best classification performance with an accuracy of 86.80%, sensitivity of 87.60%, specificity of 86.20% and AUC of 0.915, which was better than that of the CNN model only, which had an accuracy of 85.23%, sensitivity of 85.48%, specificity of 85.02%, and AUC of 0.870. In comparison, the diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and AUC value for breast radiologists were 72.08%, 100%, 43.30%, and 0.716, respectively. CONCLUSIONS:A combination of the CNN-radiomics model and clinical data could be a helpful auxiliary diagnostic tool for distinguishing between SA and BC.

Keywords: Deep learning, radiomics, breast cancer, sclerosing adenosis

DOI: 10.3233/CH-221608

Journal: Clinical Hemorheology and Microcirculation, vol. 84, no. 2, pp. 153-163, 2023