Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Issue title: Selected papers of the 38th Conference of the German Society for Clinical Microcirculation and Hemorheology, 21-23 November 2019, Braunschweig, Germany
Guest editors: P. Wiggermann, A. Krüger-Genge and F. Jung
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Rennert, Janine*; | Wiesinger, Isabel | Beyer, Lukas Philipp | Schicho, Andreas | Stroszczynski, Christian | Wiggermann, Philipp | Jung, Ernst Michael
Affiliations: Department of Radiology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
Correspondence: [*] Corresponding author: Janine Rennert, MD, Department of Radiology, University Hospital Regensburg, Franz-Josef-Strauss Allee 11, 93053 Regensburg, Germany. Tel.: +49 941 944 7401; Fax: +49 941 944 7402; E-mail: jarennert@yahoo.de.
Abstract: AIM:Evaluation of the post-interventional success following ablative techniques (radiofrequency and microwave) using a new color coded perfusion quantification software with CEUS in patients with primary and secondary liver malignancies. MATERIAL AND METHODS:75 patients (60 males, 15 females, age 24–84 years, mean 62.7 years) with 128 malignant liver lesions were included in this study. Between 01/2013 and 06/2018, the therapeutic interventional procedure in 88 lesions was MWA, in 40 lesions RFA. All patients underwent CEUS using a convex multifrequency probe (1–6 MHz) following application of 1–2.4 ml sulphur hexaflouride microbubbles, before and within 24 hours following RFA and MWA to detect residual tumor tissue. Postprocessing of the stored DICOM loops from 15 sec up to 1 min using a perfusion quantification software regarding peak enhancement (pE), time to peak (TTP), mean transit time (MTT), rise time (Ri) and Wash-in area under the curve (WiAUC) in the center of the lesion, the border area and periphery was performed. RESULTS:In patients treated with RFA, pE differences between center of the lesion vs. surrounding liver were found to be statistically extremely significant (p < 0.001), differences between center of the lesion and margin were also statistically significant (p < 0.01). mTT, TTP, WiAuC and Ri showed no significant difference between center, margin or surrounding liver.In patients treated with MWA, statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) were found for pE, Ri and mTT regarding the differences between center of lesion and surrounding tissue. WiAuC and TTP showed no significant differences between center, margin or surrounding liver. CONCLUSION:CEUS with perfusion imaging is a valuable supporting tool for post-interventional success control following RFA and MWA of primary and secondary liver maligancies. Focus should be placed upon pE following MWA and pE, Ri and mTT following RFA.
Keywords: Microwave ablation (MWA), radiofrequency ablation (RFA), contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), perfusion analysis, primary and secondary liver malignancies
DOI: 10.3233/CH-199224
Journal: Clinical Hemorheology and Microcirculation, vol. 73, no. 1, pp. 73-83, 2019
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
sales@iospress.com
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
info@iospress.nl
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office info@iospress.nl
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
china@iospress.cn
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: editorial@iospress.nl