Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: You, Qi-Qina; b | Xu, Mingc | Yao, Ming-Huaa | Xu, Guanga | Liu, Huia | Pu, Huana | Xiang, Li-Huaa | Wu, Ronga; *
Affiliations: [a] Department of Medical Ultrasound, Shanghai Tenth People’s Hospital, Ultrasound Research and Education Institute, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China | [b] Department of Medical Ultrasound, Qingpu Brance of Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China | [c] Department of Medical Ultrasound, Huai’an First People’s Hospital, Nanjing Medical University School of Medicine, Huai’an, Jiangsu, China
Correspondence: [*] Corresponding author: Rong Wu, Department of Medical Ultrasound, Shanghai Tenth People’s Hospital, Ultrasound Research and Education Institute, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200072, China. E-mail: wurong7111@163.com.
Abstract: OBJECTIVE:To determine the diagnostic value of combined conventional ultrasound (US) and acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) imaging for the differential diagnosis of BI-RADS category 4 breast lesions of different sizes. MATERIALS AND METHODS:From April 2013 to January 2015, 283 patients (with a total of 292 breast lesions) who underwent US and ARFI examination were included in this retrospective study. The SWV for the lesion and adjacent normal breast tissue were measured and the SWV ratio was calculated. VTI grade was also assessed. The lesions were separated into three groups on the basis of size, and two combinations of ARFI parameters (SWV + VTI and SWV ratio + VTI) were applied to reassess the BI-RADS categories. Diagnoses were confirmed by pathological examination after biopsy or surgery. ROC analysis was performed to assess the diagnostic efficiency of each method. The Z test was used to compare the difference between AUC of the two methods. RESULTS:Significant improvement was seen in the diagnostic performance of US with the use of the ARFI parameters SWV + VTI (77/179 [43.0%] of BI-RADS category 4A breast lesions were downgraded) and SWV ratio + VTI (64/179 [35.8%] of BI-RADS category 4A breast lesions were downgraded, including two malignant cases that were misdiagnosed as benign) (P < 0.01). The difference between the performances of the two combinations—SWV + VTI and SWV ratio + VTI—was significant only in breast lesions <10 mm in size, where the AUC of SWV ratio + VTI was significantly greater than the AUC of SWV + VTI (0.929 vs. 0.874; P < 0.01). CONCLUSION:Combination of US with ARFI can improve diagnostic performance and help avoid unnecessary biopsy in BI-RADS category 4 breast lesions. The combination of SWV ratio + VTI can improve BI-RADS classification of small lesions (<10 mm size).
Keywords: BI-RADS category 4, breast lesions, lesion size, VTQ, VTI
DOI: 10.3233/CH-170299
Journal: Clinical Hemorheology and Microcirculation, vol. 70, no. 2, pp. 143-154, 2018
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
sales@iospress.com
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
info@iospress.nl
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office info@iospress.nl
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
china@iospress.cn
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: editorial@iospress.nl