NeuroRehabilitation - Volume 52, issue 3

Authors: McIntyre, Amanda | Viana, Ricardo | Cao, Peiwen | Janzen, Shannon | Saikaley, Marcus | Harnett, Amber | Teasell, Robert

Article Type: Research Article

Abstract: BACKGROUND: More than 1,000 randomized controlled trials have been published examining the effectiveness of stroke rehabilitation interventions. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to explore the use and non-use of evidence-based stroke rehabilitation interventions in clinical practice among Occupational Therapists across various stroke rehabilitation settings in Canada. METHODS: Participants were recruited from medical centres providing rehabilitation to stroke patients in each of the ten provinces across Canada (January-July 2021). Adult (18 + years) Occupational Therapists who provide direct rehabilitative care to individuals after a stroke completed a survey in either English or French. Therapists rated their awareness, …use, and reasons for non-use of stroke rehabilitation interventions. RESULTS: 127 therapists (female = 89.8%), largely from Ontario or Quebec (62.2%) were included; most worked full-time (80.3%) in moderate-large (86.1%) cities. The greatest use of interventions were those applied to the body peripherally, without a technological component. Few individuals were aware of interventions applied to the brain (priming or stimulating) with a technological component, and they were rarely, if ever, used. CONCLUSION: Significant efforts should be made to increase the awareness of interventions which are supported by strong evidence through knowledge translation and implementation initiatives, particularly for those with a technological component. Show more

Keywords: Occupational therapy, stroke rehabilitation, randomized controlled trial, intervention, therapy, clinical practice

DOI: 10.3233/NRE-220279

Citation: NeuroRehabilitation, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 463-475, 2023

Authors: Zhao, Yue | Li, Weibo | Huang, Dai | Zhang, Weiguo | Zhang, Shaohua | Liu, Qingqing | Lv, Peiyuan | Yin, Yu

Article Type: Research Article

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Unilateral neglect (UN) is a frequent cognitive disability following a stroke. Additional research is needed to determine the most effective cognitive rehabilitation techniques. OBJECTIVE: Based on the unilateral neglect neural network, we aim to explore the effect of a new model of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) combined with cognitive training on stroke patients with unilateral neglect. METHODS: Thirty stroke patients with UN after stroke were randomly divided into three groups. All patients received cognitive training for UN and transcranial direct current stimulation with an anode placed on the corresponding part of the right hemisphere …for 2 weeks. Treatment group A received multi-site tDCS from the inferior parietal lobule, middle temporal gyrus to prefrontal lobe. Group B received single-site tDCS of the inferior parietal lobule. The improvement of UN symptoms was evaluated by the scores of the Deviation index and Behavioral Inattention Test conventional tests. RESULTS: All groups showed improvements in all tests, and the scores of the treatment groups were statistically significant compared with the control group. CONCLUSION: Both single-site tDCS and multi-site tDCS have therapeutic effects on UN after stroke, and the difference in the therapeutic effects of the two modes still needs to be further explored. Show more

Keywords: Transcranial direct currentstimulation, cognitive training, stroke, unilateral neglect

DOI: 10.3233/NRE-220265

Citation: NeuroRehabilitation, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 477-483, 2023

Authors: Maguire, Clare | Betschart, Martina | Pohl, Johannes | Primani, Francesca | Taeymans, Jan | Hund-Georgiadis, Margret

Article Type: Research Article

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) promotes activity-dependent neuroplasticity and is released following aerobic-exercise. OBJECTIVE: Feasibility and efficacy of 1.Moderate-Intensity Cycle-Ergometer-Training (MI-ET) and 2.Low-Intensity Circuit-Training (LI-CT) on BDNF-serum-concentration in chronic-stroke and consequently efficacy of motor-learning in varying BDNF-concentrations (neuroplasticity being the substrate for motor-learning) via upper-limb robotic-training (RT) in both groups. METHODS: Randomised-control feasibility-study. 12-week, 3x/week intervention, 17 chronic-stroke-survivors randomized into: (1) MI-ET&RT or (2) LI-CT&RT. Both groups completed 40 mins MI-ET or LI-CT followed by 40 mins RT. Feasibility outcomes: (1) screening and enrollment-rates, (2) retention-rates, (3) adherence: (i) attendance-rates, (ii) training-duration, (4) adverse events. Primary clinical outcomes: …1. serum-BDNF changes pre-post training (immediate) and pre-training basal-levels over 12-weeks (long-term). 2.upper-limb performance with Action-Research-Arm-Test (ARAT). Additionally, feasibility of an embedded health economic evaluation (HEE) to evaluate health-costs and cost-effectiveness. Outcomes: cost-questionnaire return-rates, cost-of-illness (COI) and Health-Utitility-Index (HUI). RESULTS: 21.5% of eligible and contactable enrolled. 10 randomized to MI-ET and 7 to LI-CT. 85% of training-sessions were completed in MI-ET (306/360) and 76.3% in LI-CT-group (165/216). 12-weeks: Drop-outs MI-ET-10%, LI-CT-43%. Clinical outcomes: No significant changes in immediate or long-term serum-BDNF in either group. Moderate-intensity aerobic-training did not increase serum-BDNF post-stroke. Individual but no group clinically-relevant changes in ARAT-scores. HEE outcomes at 12-weeks: 100% cost-questionnaires returned. Group-costs baseline and after treatment, consistently favouring MI-ET group. COI: (1-year-time-frame): MI-ET 67382 SD (43107) Swiss-Francs and LI-CT 95701(29473) Swiss-Francs. CONCLUSION: The study is feasible with modifications. Future studies should compare high-intensity versus moderate-intensity aerobic-exercise combined with higher dosage arm-training. Show more

Keywords: Stroke, aerobic training, BDNF, circuit training, upper-limb robotic training, health economic evaluation

DOI: 10.3233/NRE-220239

Citation: NeuroRehabilitation, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 485-506, 2023

Authors: Pereira, Vitor Costa | Fontão, Luís | Engenheiro, Gonçalo | Gouveia, Filipa | Pinto, Luísa | Leal, Joana | Moreira, Jorge | Aguiar-Branco, Catarina | Roriz, José Mário

Article Type: Research Article

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Dysphagia is a common manifestation after stroke and seems to play a major role in clinical and functional outcomes. OBJECTIVES: To identify clinical predictors of higher degrees of dysphagia, as well as assess its burden in our hospital, in order to understand how to improve the approach to this symptom. METHODS: We included 311 patients admitted in an acute stroke unit in a year-long period. The relationship of dysphagia with different outcomes, both in acute phase and within the first year after stroke, were investigated. RESULTS: Using the Pearson Correlation Coefficient, NIHSS score …at admission was positively correlated with the degree of dysphagia (r  = 0,783; p  < 0,001) and total anterior circulation infarcts and age (> 70 years) were also associated with higher risk of dysphagia (p  < 0.001). During hospitalization both respiratory infections and mortality occurred at significantly higher rates for dysphagic patients (p  < 0.001) and we observed an increasing trend towards a higher mortality rate, the higher the degree of dysphagia. These patients stayed longer in the stroke unit, with less chance to be discharged home and more frequently transferred to inpatient rehabilitation care. One year after admission, dysphagic patients were more frequently readmitted due to pneumonia and we observed a higher mortality rate compared to patients without dysphagia (p  < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The presence of the above-mentioned dysphagia predictive factors should alert us to the need for an early approach, starting in the stroke unit, but also after discharge, taking into account its impact on clinical outcomes, mortality and healthcare costs. Show more

Keywords: Dysphagia, swallowing impairment, stroke, risk factors, outcomes, rehabilitation

DOI: 10.3233/NRE-220242

Citation: NeuroRehabilitation, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 507-514, 2023

Authors: Ferrario, Irene

Article Type: Other

Abstract: BACKGROUND: It is estimated that 50% to 80% of people living with dementia worldwide remain undiagnosed and undocumented and have no access to care and treatment. Telehealth services can be utilized as one of the options to improve access to a diagnosis, especially for people living in rural areas or affected by COVID-19 containment measures. OBJECTIVE: To assess the diagnostic accuracy of telehealth assessment for dementia and mild cognitive impairment (MCI). METHODS: A summary of the Cochrane Review by McCleery et al. 2021, with comments from a rehabilitation perspective. RESULTS: Three cross-sectional diagnostic test …accuracy studies (N = 136) were included. Participants were referred from primary care when presenting with cognitive symptoms or were identified as being at high risk of having dementia on a screening test in the care homes. The studies found that telehealth assessment correctly identified 80% to 100% of the people who were diagnosed with dementia during face-to-face assessment and also correctly identified 80% to 100% of people who did not have dementia. Only one study (N = 100) focused on MCI; 71% of participants who had MCI and 73% of participants who did not have MCI were correctly identified via telehealth assessment. Telehealth assessment in this study correctly identified 97% of the participants who had either MCI or dementia, but correctly identified only 22% of those who did not have either. CONCLUSION: Telehealth assessment for diagnosing dementia seems to have a good level of accuracy when compared to face-to-face assessment, although the small number of studies and small sample sizes and differences between the included studies indicate that the results are uncertain. Show more

Keywords: Dementia, mild cognitive impairment, telehealth, systematic review

DOI: 10.3233/NRE-230001

Citation: NeuroRehabilitation, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 515-517, 2023