Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Purchase individual online access for 1 year to this journal.
Price: EUR 410.00Impact Factor 2024: 0.4
Fundamenta Informaticae is an international journal publishing original research results in all areas of theoretical computer science. Papers are encouraged contributing:
- solutions by mathematical methods of problems emerging in computer science
- solutions of mathematical problems inspired by computer science.
Topics of interest include (but are not restricted to): theory of computing, complexity theory, algorithms and data structures, computational aspects of combinatorics and graph theory, programming language theory, theoretical aspects of programming languages, computer-aided verification, computer science logic, database theory, logic programming, automated deduction, formal languages and automata theory, concurrency and distributed computing, cryptography and security, theoretical issues in artificial intelligence, machine learning, pattern recognition, algorithmic game theory, bioinformatics and computational biology, quantum computing, probabilistic methods, & algebraic and categorical methods.
Article Type: Other
DOI: 10.3233/FI-1991-14401
Citation: Fundamenta Informaticae, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. i-viii, 1991
Authors: Blikle, Andrzej
Article Type: Research Article
Abstract: Partial functions, hence also partial predicates, cannot be avoided in algorithms. However, in spite of the fact that partial functions have been formally introduced into the theory of software very early, partial predicates are still not quite commonly recognized. In many programming- and software-specification languages partial Boolean expressions are treated in a rather simplistic way: the evaluation of a Boolean sub-expression to an error leads to the evaluation of the hosting Boolean expression to an error and, in the consequence, to the abortion of the whole program. This technique is known as an eager evaluation of expressions. A …more practical approach to the evaluation of expressions – gaining more interest today among both theoreticians and programming-language designers – is lazy evaluation . Lazily evaluated Boolean expressions correspond to (non-strict) three-valued predicates where the third value represents both an error and an undefinedness . On the semantic ground this leads to a three-valued propositional calculus, three-valued quantifiers and an appropriate logic. This paper is a survey-essay devoted to the discussion and the comparison of a few three-valued propositional and predicate calculi and to the discussion of the author’s claim that a two-valued logic, rather than a three-valued logic, is suitable for the treatment of programs with three-valued Boolean expressions. The paper is written in a formal but not in a formalized style. All discussion is carried on a semantic ground. We talk about predicates (functions) and a semantic consequence relation rather than about expressions and inference rules. However, the paper is followed by more formalized works which carry our discussion further on a formalized ground, and where corresponding formal logics are constructed and discussed. Show more
DOI: 10.3233/FI-1991-14402
Citation: Fundamenta Informaticae, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 387-410, 1991
Authors: Konikowska, Beata | Tarlecki, Andrzej | Blikle, Andrzej
Article Type: Research Article
Abstract: Different calculi of partial or three-valued predicates have been used and studied by several authors in the context of software specification, development and validation. This paper offers a critical survey on the development of three-valued logics based on such calculi. In the first part of the paper we review two three-valued predicate calculi, based on, respectively, McCarthy’s and Kleene’s propositional connectives and quantifiers, and point out that in a three-valued logic one should distinguish between two notions of validity: strong validity (always true) and weak validity (never false). We define in model-theoretic terms a number of consequence …relations for three-valued logics. Each of them is determined by the choice of the underlying predicate calculus and of the weak or strong validity of axioms and of theorems. We discuss mutual relationships between consequence relations defined in such a way and study some of their basic properties. The second part of the paper is devoted to the development of a formal deductive system of inference rules for a three-valued logic. We use the method of semantic tableaux (slightly modified to deal with three-valued formulas) to develop a Gentzen-style system of inference rules for deriving valid sequents, from which we then derive a sound and complete system of natural deduction rules. We have chosen to study the consequence relation determined by the predicate calculus with McCarthy’s propositional connectives and Kleene’s quantifiers and by the strong interpretation of both axioms and theorems. Although we find this choice appropriate for applications in the area of software specification, verification and development, we regard this logic merely as an example and use it to present some general techniques of developing a sequent calculus and a natural deduction system for a three-valued logic. We also discuss the extension of this logic by a non-monotone is-true predicate. Show more
DOI: 10.3233/FI-1991-14403
Citation: Fundamenta Informaticae, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 411-453, 1991
Authors: Novotný, Miroslav | Pawlak, Zdzizław
Article Type: Research Article
Abstract: The semilattice of all subsets of a finite nonempty set provided with the operation of union and a congruence of this semilattice enable to define independent elements of the semilattice. Reducts, subreducts, and superreducts of an arbitrary element in the semilattice are introduced and investigated. A particular type of congruence, the so called rough top equality, is studied. These algebraic notions and methods are applied to black boxes, to information systems, and to contexts in Wille’s sense. The algebraic results are used to solve the problem whether two sets of inputs give the same output in a black box, …whether two sets of attributes define the same classification of objects in an information system, and, finally, whether two sets of features generate the same concept in a context. Partial dependence between two sets of attributes of an information system is introduced and a distance between these sets is defined. Show more
Keywords: dependence space, independence, reduct, subreduct, superreduct, rough top equality, black box, information system, context, partial dependence
DOI: 10.3233/FI-1991-14404
Citation: Fundamenta Informaticae, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 454-476, 1991
Authors: Korczynski, Waldemar
Article Type: Research Article
Abstract: In this paper an algebraic characterization of a class of Petri nets is given. The nets are characterized by a kind of algebras, which can be considered as a generalization of the concept of the case graph of a (marked) Petri net.
DOI: 10.3233/FI-1991-14405
Citation: Fundamenta Informaticae, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 477-491, 1991
Authors: Comer, Stephen D.
Article Type: Research Article
Abstract: This paper is based on the notion of an information system <U ,Ω,V ,f > in the sense of Pawlak. Every set of knowledge P ⊆ Ω determines a closure operator on U . The class of Boolean algebras with added operations determined by all sets of know ledge are axiomatixed. As a consequence of the representation theorem information systems can be constructed that have a prescribed lattice of functional dependencies.
DOI: 10.3233/FI-1991-14406
Citation: Fundamenta Informaticae, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 492-502, 1991
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
sales@iospress.com
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
info@iospress.nl
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office info@iospress.nl
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
china@iospress.cn
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: editorial@iospress.nl