Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Purchase individual online access for 1 year to this journal.
Price: EUR 410.00Impact Factor 2024: 0.4
Fundamenta Informaticae is an international journal publishing original research results in all areas of theoretical computer science. Papers are encouraged contributing:
- solutions by mathematical methods of problems emerging in computer science
- solutions of mathematical problems inspired by computer science.
Topics of interest include (but are not restricted to): theory of computing, complexity theory, algorithms and data structures, computational aspects of combinatorics and graph theory, programming language theory, theoretical aspects of programming languages, computer-aided verification, computer science logic, database theory, logic programming, automated deduction, formal languages and automata theory, concurrency and distributed computing, cryptography and security, theoretical issues in artificial intelligence, machine learning, pattern recognition, algorithmic game theory, bioinformatics and computational biology, quantum computing, probabilistic methods, & algebraic and categorical methods.
Article Type: Other
Citation: Fundamenta Informaticae, vol. 82, no. 4, pp. i-i, 2008
Authors: Stehr, Mark-Oliver
Article Type: Research Article
Abstract: The design of complex software systems fundamentally relies on the understanding of abstract components and their interactions. Although compositional techniques are being successfully employed in practice, the use of such techniques is often rather informal and intuitive, and typically a justification for correct behaviour of the composed system exists but is not expressed explicitly. In this paper, we show what can be gained from treating such justifications as first-class citizens. The fairly general setting for …this paper is a formal development of a UNITY-style temporal logic for labeled transition systems in the calculus of inductive constructions which has been conducted using the Coq proof assistant in a formally rigorous way. Our development not only subsumes the original UNITY approach to program verification and the more recent approach of New UNITY, but goes beyond it in several essential aspects, such as the generality of the program/system model (arbitrary labeled transition systems instead of UNITY programs), the notion of fairness (weak group fairness instead of unconditional fairness), and the issue of compositionality (not only for safety but also for liveness assertions). The last aspect, which we feel is crucial in the foundations for software engineering, is subject of this paper. We present a general proof rule for compositional verification of liveness assertions in tightly coupled systems. It relies on a notion of compositional proofs, which in turn is closely related to classical work on interference-free proofs for parallel programs. The formulation of this new proof rule and the verification of its soundness does not only exploit the strong inductive reasoning capabilities of the calculus of inductive constructions, but it also uses the propositions-as-types interpretation and the associated proofs-as-objects interpretation in an essential way. Show more
Citation: Fundamenta Informaticae, vol. 82, no. 4, pp. 311-340, 2008
Authors: Johnsen, Einar Broch | Owe, Olaf | Torjusen, Arild B.
Article Type: Research Article
Abstract: Many distributed applications can be understood in terms of components interacting in an open environment such as the Internet. Open environments are subject to change in unpredictable ways, as applications may arrive, evolve, or disappear. In order to validate components in such environments, it can be useful to build simulation environments which reflect this highly unpredictable behavior. This paper considers the validation of components with respect to behavioral interfaces. Behavioral interfaces specify …semantic requirements on the observable behavior of components, expressed in an assume-guarantee style. In our approach, a rewriting logic model is transparently extended with the history of all observable communications, and metalevel strategies are used to guide the simulation of environment behavior. Over-specification of the environment is avoided by allowing arbitrary environment behavior within the bounds of the assumption on observable behavior, while the component is validated with respect to the guarantee of the behavioral interface. Show more
Keywords: Validation, components, behavioral interfaces, adaptive testing, rewriting logic
Citation: Fundamenta Informaticae, vol. 82, no. 4, pp. 341-359, 2008
Authors: Clarke, Dave
Article Type: Research Article
Abstract: Software systems evolve over time. From a component-based software engineering perspective, this means that either the components of the system need to change, or, if components are connected using a coordination layer, then the way in which they are connected needs to change, or both. In some situations, changes must be performed without stopping the running system. This not only introduces a serious technological challenge, it also makes reasoning about the evolving system difficult. One approach …to this problem is to use component connectors to plug components together. Reconfiguration of a system can then be reduced to reconfiguring the component connector, as changing component implementations can be implemented by changing which components the connector connects together. The coordination language Reo offers operations to dynamically reconfigure the topology of component connectors, but until now, no means for reasoning about reconfiguration in Reo has been developed. This issue is addressed in this paper. To enable reasoning about connector behaviour, and hence behaviour of the composed system, we present a semantics of Reo in the presence of reconfiguration, and a logic together with its model checking algorithm. Show more
Keywords: Dynamic Reconfiguration, Coordination, Component Connectors, Reo
Citation: Fundamenta Informaticae, vol. 82, no. 4, pp. 361-390, 2008
Authors: Ábrahám, Erika | de Boer, Frank S. | de Roever, Willem-Paul | Steffen, Martin
Article Type: Research Article
Abstract: Besides the features of a class-based object-oriented language, Java integrates concurrency via its thread-classes, allowing for a multithreaded flow of control. Besides that, the language offers a flexible exception mechanism for handling errors or exceptional program conditions. To reason about safety-properties of Java-programs and extending previous work on the proof theory for monitor synchronization, we introduce in this paper an assertional proof method for JavaMT ("Multi-Threaded Java"), a small concurrent …sublanguage of Java, covering concurrency and especially exception handling. We show soundness and relative completeness of the proof method. Show more
Citation: Fundamenta Informaticae, vol. 82, no. 4, pp. 391-463, 2008
Authors: Esmaeilsabzali, Shahram | Day, Nancy A. | Mavaddat, Farhad
Article Type: Research Article
Abstract: Many formalisms use interleaving to model concurrency. To describe some system behaviours appropriately, we need to limit interleaving. For example, in a component-based system, we might wish to limit interleaving to force the inputs to a method to arrive together in order. InWeb services, the arrival of XML messages consisting of multiple simple parts should not be interleaved with the behaviour of another component. We introduce interface automata with complex actions (IACA), which adds complex actions …to de Alfaro and Henzinger's interface automata (IA). A complex action is a sequence of actions that may not be interleaved with actions from other components. The composition operation and refinement relation are more involved in IACA compared to IA, and we must sacrifice associativity of composition. However, we argue that the advantages of having complex actions make it a useful formalism. We provide proofs of various properties of IACA and discuss the use of IACA for modellingWeb services. Show more
Citation: Fundamenta Informaticae, vol. 82, no. 4, pp. 465-512, 2008
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
sales@iospress.com
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
info@iospress.nl
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office info@iospress.nl
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
china@iospress.cn
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: editorial@iospress.nl