Are pharmacological interventions clinically useful to treat emotionalism after stroke? A Cochrane Review update summary with commentary

1Background

Emotionalism, i.e. (1) episodes of crying (or less commonly laughing) post stroke that are (2) uncontrolled, and (3) not triggered by situations that would have previously provoked such behavior occurs not infrequently in stroke survivors. These episodes may or may not be triggered by a congruent emotion. Within the first month after stroke, emotionalism is observed in about 17% of stroke survivors, 20% between one and six months, and 12% thereafter (Gillespie et al., 2016), hence affecting a considerable proportion of stroke survivors. Clinically, emotionalism is distinct and needs to be distinguished from post stroke emotional disorders such as post stroke depression (PSD). It is important to inform those affected about the nature of the condition and to assess the presence or absence of co-morbid post stroke emotional disorders. Emotionalism with or without depression has traditionally been treated with antidepressants despite limited information on their effectiveness.

“Pharmaceutical interventions for emotionalism after stroke”

(Allida, Patel, House, & Hackett, 2019)

2Objective

This Cochrane review is an update of the reviews published in 2004 first and updated in 2010 (Hackett et al., 2010) and sought evidence for clinical benefit, acceptability and harm when pharmacological interventions were used with the intention to treat emotionalism post stroke.

3What was studied and methods

The population addressed in this review was people with a confirmed history of stroke and diagnosed as having emotionalism. The intervention studied was the use of pharmacological agents for the treatment of emotionalism following stroke. The intervention was compared to placebo treatment. The primary outcome studied was emotionalism. Emotionalism measures were as follows:

Secondary outcomes included emotionalism at end of treatment, depression, cognitive functioning, activities of daily living (ADL), and disadvantages of treatment (adverse events, including death). A comprehensive search (up to May 2018) for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or quasi-RCTs comparing psychotropic medication to placebo to treat stroke survivors with emotionalism was performed.

4Results

From a total of 7 eligible trials with a total of 239 participants, five with 213 participants could be used for data extraction. Antidepressants used in the included trials were selective serotonine reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), i.e. citalopram, fluoxetine, and sertraline, and tricyclic antidepressants (TCA), i.e. amitriptyline or nortriptyline.

Key results are:

5Conclusions

The authors concluded that antidepressants may reduce the frequency and severity of outbursts of crying or laughing based on very low quality evidence. They further state that caution is needed to interpret the conclusions despite the very large effect due to several methodological deficiencies in the trials. While the effect does not seem specific to a particular drug or class of drugs, there were too few trials to assess this endpoint. There is a need for more reliable data to be able to make reliable conclusions about the treatment of post-stroke emotionalism.

6Implications for practice in neurorehabilitation

Only a rather limited number of placebo-controlled RCTs (seven) that address the clinical benefit and risks associated with psychopharmacological treatment of emotionalism post stroke and included a limited overall number of participants (239) could be identified. Several factors limit our ability to draw conclusions for clinical practice in neurorehabilitation based on the Cochrane evidence presented. Overall, the data are rather limited with a few, mainly small studies with a risk for publication bias and imprecision of results which make the quality of evidence ranging from very low to moderate; risk of bias assessment was restricted by inadequate reporting in some of the included trials. Participants varied considerably with regard to time post stroke, and presumably co-morbid PSD. Across included trials, different types of antidepressants had been used for diverse periods of time ranging from 10 to 182 days. No sufficiently validated assessment tool for emotionalism exists as a “gold standard” that could have been used in those trials. Information on acceptability and harm is limited, adverse event reporting was poor. With all these weaknesses in mind, no clear recommendation can be deduced for clinical practice.

The review does, however, present some low quality evidence that antidepressants may reduce the frequency and severity of crying or laughing episodes in people experiencing emotionalism post stroke without an indication for associated clinically relevant harm. Accordingly, antidepressants may be used to treat emotionalism post stroke on an individual basis with careful evaluation of the clinical benefit and any adverse events. Based on their risk profile SSRIs might be preferable over TCA; the implications of such use as “off-label” need to be taken into consideration.

Conflict of interest

The author declares no conflicts of interest.