Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Aprile, Irenea; * | Iacovelli, Chiaraa | Padua, Lucaa; b | Galafate, Danielec | Criscuolo, Simonec | Gabbani, Deborac | Cruciani, Ariannaa | Germanotta, Marcoa | Di Sipio, Enricaa | De Pisi, Francescoc | Franceschini, Marcoc
Affiliations: [a] Don Carlo Gnocchi Onlus Foundation, Milan, Italy | [b] Department of Geriatrics, Neurosciences and Orthopedics, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy | [c] IRCSS S. Raffaele Pisana Roma, Rome, Italy
Correspondence: [*] Address for correspondence: Irene Aprile, Don Carlo Gnocchi Onlus Foundation, Via Casal del Marmo 401, Rome, 00166, Italy. Tel.: +39 0 6 30 15 66 23; E-mail: iaprile@dongnocchi.it.
Abstract: BACKGROUND:The gait recovery is a realist goal in the rehabilitation of almost Stroke patients. Over the last years, the introduction of robotic technologies in gait rehabilitation of stroke patients has had a greatest interest. OBJECTIVE:The aim of this study was to evaluate efficacy of Robotic Gait Training (RGT) in chronic stroke patients. METHODS:Fourteen chronic stroke patients were divided into two groups. Six patients received RGT, eight patients received traditional gait rehabilitation. Patients were assessed with clinical scales, as well as with gait analysis, at the beginning and at the end of the treatment. RESULTS:Significant changes in some clinical scales for both the groups were detected. In the robotic group, patients showed higher percentage changes in the MRC scale (p = 0.020), in the 6MWT (p = 0.043) and in the Ashworth scale (hip: p = 0.008; knee: p = 0.043; ankle: p = 0.043) when compared with the traditional group. With respect to the gait analysis, we did not found any difference neither in the within–group analysis, nor in the between–group analysis. CONCLUSIONS:Both rehabilitation treatments do not change the compensatory strategies in chronic patients but the RGT offers to the patients a more intensive and controlled gait training increasing the gait endurance and decreasing spasticity in the lower limb.
Keywords: Stroke, robotics, rehabilitation, chronic, gait analysis
DOI: 10.3233/NRE-172156
Journal: NeuroRehabilitation, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 775-782, 2017
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
sales@iospress.com
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
info@iospress.nl
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office info@iospress.nl
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
china@iospress.cn
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: editorial@iospress.nl