Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Piazza, Stefanoa; * | Serrano-Muñoz, Diegob | Gómez-Soriano, Juliob; c | Torricelli, Diegoa | Segura-Fragosa, Antoniod | Pons, José Luisa; e | Taylor, Julianb; f; g
Affiliations: [a] Neural Rehabilitation Group, Cajal Institute, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Madrid, Spain | [b] Sensorimotor Function Group, Hospital Nacional de Parapléjicos, Toledo, Spain | [c] Toledo Physiotherapy Research Group, Nursing and Physiotherapy School, Castilla La Mancha University, Toledo, Spain | [d] Health Sciences Institute, Consejería de Sanidad, Talavera de la Reina, Spain | [e] Tecnológico de Monterrey, Mexico | [f] Stoke Mandeville Spinal Research, National Spinal Injuries Centre, Aylesbury, UK | [g] Harris Manchester College, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
Correspondence: [*] Address for correspondence: Stefano Piazza, Cajal Institute, Av Doctor Arce, 37, 28002 Madrid, Spain. Tel.: +34 915854750; Fax: +34 915854754; E-mail: stefano.piazza@csic.es.
Abstract: OBJECTIVE: Appropriate afferent feedback delivery during the execution of motor tasks is important for rehabilitation after incomplete spinal cord injury (iSCI). However, during leg-cycling therapy, the plantar afferent feedback is minimal. We hypothesize that the augmentation of sensory input by combining cycling with a locomotor-like stimulation of plantar cutaneous innervations (ES-cycling), might help to restore proper spinal processing of sensorimotor function. METHODS: Thirteen non-injured subjects and 10 subjects with iSCI performed 10 minutes of cycling and, on another session, of ES-cycling. To assess spinal processing of sensorimotor function, soleus H-reflex response was tested following a conditioning plantar electrical stimulation applied at 25–100 ms inter-stimulus intervals (ISI’s), measured before and after the execution of the tasks. RESULTS: Before tasks execution, the conditioned H-reflex response was modulated in non-injured subjects, and absent in subjects with iSCI; after cycling, modulation profiles were unchanged. However, after ES-cycling a significant increase in H-reflex excitability was observed in the non-injured group at 100 ms ISI (p < 0.05), and in the iSCI group between 50–75 ms ISI (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The loss of reflex modulation in subjects with iSCI suggests reduced spinal processing of sensorimotor function. Reflex modulation recovery after ES-cycling may indicate the partial reactivation of these mechanisms.
Keywords: Spinal cord injury, sensorimotor processing, soleus H-reflex, leg-cycling, afferent feedback
DOI: 10.3233/NRE-161430
Journal: NeuroRehabilitation, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 429-437, 2017
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
sales@iospress.com
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
info@iospress.nl
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office info@iospress.nl
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
china@iospress.cn
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: editorial@iospress.nl