Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Hartsell, H. D.a; *; **
Affiliations: [a] University of Western Ontario
Note: [*] Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Applied Health Sciences, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.
Note: [**] Address reprint requests to Dr. H. D. Hartsell, Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Applied Health Sciences, University of Western Ontario, London Ontario, Canada NGG IHI.
Abstract: The purposes of the study were to (1) identify ratios for the evertor and invertor muscles of the ankle and (2) determine whether gender differences existed in ankle strength ratios of healthy, young adults. Twelve females and 13 males consented to be tested bilaterally on a single occasion for ankle inversion and eversion at two velocities (30 and 120 deg/sec) using the Cybex 330 isokinetic dynamometer (Cybex, Ronkonkoma, NY). Two- and three-way analyses of variance and post-hoc Neuman-Keuls tests were used to analyze the data. Results indicated that the invertor muscles were stronger than the evertor muscles at all velocities (26.31% at 30 deg/sec, 29.14% at 120 deg/sec), ankles tested (32.35% for the preferred, 22.23% for the nonpreferred), and genders (26.08% for males, 29.39% for females). With the exception of inversion at the slow velocity for the preferred ankle, there were no differences between the ankles for velocities or movements tested. Similar ratios of eversion/inversion strength were observed for each gender at either velocity. However, ratios differed significantly between the preferred (dominant) and nonpreferred (nondominant) ankles. It was concluded that individual ratios must be used to determine appropriate antagonistic strength ratios for the preferred and nonpreferred ankles (65% and 75%, respectively) and that no differences in gender effect were observed.
Keywords: Invertor/evertor strength, muscle ratios, isokinetic evaluation
DOI: 10.3233/IES-1994-4306
Journal: Isokinetics and Exercise Science, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 116-121, 1994
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
sales@iospress.com
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
info@iospress.nl
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office info@iospress.nl
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
china@iospress.cn
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: editorial@iospress.nl