Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Vanderthommen, M.a | Soltani, K.a | Maquet, D.a | Crielaard, J.M.a | Croisier, J.L.a
Affiliations: [a] Department of Motor Sciences, University of Liege, 4000 Liege, Belgium
Note: [] Address for correspondence: Prof. Marc Vanderthommen, University of Liege, ISEPK (B21), Allée des Sports 4, B-4000 Liege, Belgium. Tel.: +32 4 366 38 78; Fax: +32 4 366 29 01; E-mail: mvanderthommen@ulg.ac.be
Abstract: Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (ES) and passive recovery (PR) were compared in ten healthy men after a provocation exercise inducing delayed onset of muscle soreness (DOMS). The exercise consisted of 3 sets of 30 maximal eccentric contractions performed by the knee flexor muscles of the dominant leg on an isokinetic dynamometer at 60°/s angular velocity. There was an interval of 8 weeks between both bouts and the order of the recovery mode (ES or PR) was block-randomly assigned. ES recovery consisted of a 25-min continuous and non-tetanic (5 Hz) stimulation of the hamstring muscles. Concentric and eccentric hamstrings peak torques were evaluated before and immediately after the provocation exercise, after the recovery period, as well as 24 h (d1), 48 h (d2), 72 h (d3) and 168 h (d7) after the bout. Subjective perception of muscle soreness (VAS, 0–10 a.u.) was evaluated before exercise and at d1, d2, d3 and d7. To assess the CK activity, five blood samples were drawn before exercise and at d1, d2, d3 and d7. For both recovery modes, the greatest reductions in isokinetic muscle performances were measured on d2 (66.3 ± 24.1% of initial values (ES) vs. 57.4 ± 26.5% (PR) for the concentric mode and 55.6 ± 16% (ES) vs. 53.1 ± 19.3% (PR) for the eccentric mode). d2 also corresponded to the highest painful sensations (5.4 ± 2.14 a.u. (ES) vs. 6.15 ± 2.55 a.u. (PR)). Peak activities of CK were reached on d3 (47507 ± 19973 IU/l (ES) vs. 75887 ± 41962 IU/l (PR)). Serum CK was lower with ES than PR at d3 (p⩽0.05) but all other parameters changed in a manner that was not statistically different between the two recovery protocols (p>0.05). This strong trend could be explained by an electro-induced hyperperfusion that may efficiently wash out the muscle from the cellular debris resulting from the initial injury, and hence diminish the inflammatory response and the delayed amplification of tissue damages.
Keywords: Electrical stimulation, muscle recovery, isokinetic exercise, muscle damage, delayed onset muscle soreness
DOI: 10.3233/IES-2007-0280
Journal: Isokinetics and Exercise Science, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 143-149, 2007
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
sales@iospress.com
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
info@iospress.nl
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office info@iospress.nl
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
china@iospress.cn
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: editorial@iospress.nl