Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Koo, T.K.K.; ; | Chao, E.Y.S. | Mak, A.F.T.
Affiliations: Jockey Club Rehabilitation Engineering Centre, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China | Orthopaedic Biomechanics Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, USA
Note: [] Corresponding author: Terry K.K. Koo, PhD, Research Fellow, Jockey Club Rehabilitation Engineering Center, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hunghom, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China. Tel.: +852 2766 4926; Fax: +852 2362 4365; E-mail: rcterry@polyu.edu.hk.
Abstract: A primary function of external fixator is to stabilize the fracture site after fracture reduction. Conventional fracture reduction method would result in fixator configurations deviated from its neutral configuration. How the non-neutral configurations would affect the biomechanical performance of unilateral external fixators is still not well-documented. We developed a finite element model to predict the fixation stiffness of the Dynafix unilateral external fixator at arbitrary configurations under compression, torsion, three-point, and four-point bending. Experimental testing was done to validate the model using six Dynafix unilateral external fixators in neutral and particular non-neutral configurations. Effects of loading directions on bending stiffness were also studied. It appeared that the model succeeded in revealing the relative stiffness of the neutral and non-neutral configuration in all the loading conditions. Our results also demonstrated that bending stiffness could vary substantially for different loading directions and the principle loading directions could be very different for different fixator configurations. Therefore, a more logical way to compare the bending stiffness is to identify the principle loading directions of each fixator configuration and used their maximum and minimum bending stiffness as comparison criteria. Given that fixator configurations could substantially change the stiffness properties of the bone–fixator system, computer simulation with finite element modeling of this kind will provide useful clinical information on the rigidity of certain configurations in stabilizing the fracture site for bone healing.
Keywords: Finite element analysis, external fixator, fixation stiffness, bone fracture fixation
Journal: Bio-Medical Materials and Engineering, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 433-444, 2005
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
sales@iospress.com
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
info@iospress.nl
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office info@iospress.nl
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
china@iospress.cn
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: editorial@iospress.nl