Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Cavaco, Adrianaa; b; | Durães, Luísab | Ramalho, Amílcarc | Pais, Sandrad
Affiliations: [a] ESSUAlg, School of Health, University of Algarve, Portugal | [b] CIEPQPF, Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Coimbra, Portugal | [c] CEMMPRE, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Coimbra, Portugal | [d] CBMR, Department of Biomedical Sciences and Medicine, University of Algarve, Portugal
Correspondence: [*] Corresponding author: Adriana Cavaco (PhD), School of Health, University of Algarve, Campus de Gambelas Ed 1, 8005-139 Faro, Portugal. Tel.: +351 289 800 100; E-mail: aicavaco@ualg.pt
Abstract: BACKGROUND:Interfaces of transtibial prosthesis have an important role in the transmission of ground reaction forces, damping gait loads and tissue protection. OBJECTIVE:This work aims to study the influence of prosthesis interfaces on amputees’ gait and perception on pain, comfort and the overall interface/prosthesis system. METHODS:Commercial samples of three different interface materials were selected: block copolymer (Material I), silicone gel (Material II) and silicone elastomer (Material III). Using standardized prosthesis, four amputee subjects performed gait tests at three imposed cadences in a barometric platform. The subjects also filled in a questionnaire about their perception. RESULTS:Material II presented the highest asymmetries of vertical ground reaction forces and was perceived as the most painful and uncomfortable. Material III led to the most symmetric load distribution between legs and was perceived as the most comfortable. Material I showed better overall biomechanical behavior and better subject’s perception. CONCLUSIONS:Material III showed appropriate characteristics for lower levels of activity for which it is recommended. Prescription of Material II should be rethought, as it is only adequate for specific and occasional situations. Material I should be considered adequate for both active and less active amputees. When correlating the subjects’ perception with the interface properties, we concluded that the mechanical properties are the most influential.
Keywords: Limb prosthesis, gait analysis, transtibial amputees, materials testing, silicone, block copolymer
DOI: 10.3233/BME-206002
Journal: Bio-Medical Materials and Engineering, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 211-223, 2020
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
sales@iospress.com
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
info@iospress.nl
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office info@iospress.nl
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
china@iospress.cn
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: editorial@iospress.nl