Affiliations: [a] Department of Cardiology, The Affiliated Chuzhou Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Chuzhou, Anhui, China | [b] Department of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China
Correspondence:
[*]
Corresponding author: Jun Zhang, Department of Cardiology, The Affiliated Chuzhou Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Zuiweng Road 369, Chuzhou, Anhui 239001, China. E-mail: zhangjun_med@163.com.
Note: [1] These authors contributed equally to this study.
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Pacing is the most effective and dependable method for treating complete atrioventricular block (AVB). OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to investigate the use of His bundle pacing (HBP) in patients with atrioventricular block. METHODS: Patients who underwent HBP or right ventricular pacing (RVP) were enrolled and divided into two groups: the HBP group and the RVP group, respectively. We compared baseline clinical data, fluoroscopy duration, operation duration, pacing electrode parameters during the operation or follow-up, baseline QRS duration, and pacing QRS duration. RESULTS: HBP was attempted in 48 patients and was successful in 34 patients who were included in the HBP group. In addition, 30 RVP patients were included in the RVP group. Fluoroscopy duration and operation duration were significantly longer in the HBP group compared to the RVP group. Compared to the RVP group, the HBP group had a higher pacing threshold, a lower R wave amplitude, and a shorter pacing QRS duration. At 6 months of follow-up, the pacing threshold remained higher, the R wave amplitude was significantly lower, and the end-diastolic diameter of the left ventricle was smaller in the HBP group. CONCLUSION: HBP was safe and effective for atrioventricular block despite the longer fluoroscopy and operation duration in the HBP group when compared to the RVP group.
Keywords: Atrioventricular block, his bundle pacing, left ventricular remodeling, right ventricular pacing
