Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Guenther, S.P.W.a; * | Schirren, M.a | Boulesteix, A.L.b | Busen, H.b | Poettinger, T.a | Pichlmaier, A.M.a | Khaladj, N.a | Hagl, C.a
Affiliations: [a] Department of Cardiac Surgery, University Hospital Munich, Ludwig-Maximilian-University, Munich, Germany | [b] Department of Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, Ludwig-Maximilian-University, Munich, Germany
Correspondence: [*] Corresponding author: Sabina Guenther, Department of Cardiac Surgery, University Hospital Munich, Ludwig-Maximilian-University, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany. Tel.: +49 (0)89/4400 73457; Fax: +49 (0)89/4400 78873; E-mail: sabina.guenther@med.uni-muenchen.de.
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Survival rates of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest remain poor. Bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is crucial for survival and feedback devices could improve its quality. OBJECTIVE: We investigated the quality of chest compression when using the Cardio First AngelTM (CFA) feedback device compared to standard basic life support (BLS). The analysis focused on laymen. METHODS: Laymen without (n= 43) and with (n= 96) explanation of the device, medical students (n= 128) and medical staff (n= 27) performed 60 seconds of standard versus assisted chest compression using the CFA on a resuscitation manikin. Compression frequency, depth and position were analyzed according to current guidelines. RESULTS: Laymen showed significantly better success rates regarding correct compression depth when using the CFA (23.3% vs. 55.8%, p= 0.004 and 25.0% vs. 52.1%, p< 0.001, laymen without and with explanation of the device, respectively). Medical students likewise improved (22.7% vs. 42.2%, p= 0.004). Hand positioning was 100% correct in all groups with the device. Improvement in frequency yielded by the CFA was more pronounced for probands with fears of contact (p= 0.02). The benefit of using the device did not differ significantly in laymen with or without explanation. CONCLUSIONS: Chest compression as performed by laymen was significantly improved with regard to compression depth when using the CFA for guidance and feedback. With the device, no cases of incorrect hand positioning occurred in any group.
Keywords: Cardiopulmonary resuscitation, cardiac arrest, chest compression, CPR quality, Cardio First AngelTM
DOI: 10.3233/THC-170862
Journal: Technology and Health Care, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 69-80, 2018
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
sales@iospress.com
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
info@iospress.nl
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office info@iospress.nl
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
china@iospress.cn
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: editorial@iospress.nl