Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Issue title: Over a Decade of Developing the Assistive Technology Field in the UK
Subtitle:
Guest editors: Donna Cowan, Simon Judge and Peter Cudd
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Jeanvoine, Arnauda; c; * | Gnansia, Danc | Truy, Erica; d | Berger-Vachon, Christiana; b
Affiliations: [a] Lyon Neuroscience Research Center, PACS Team, Lyon, France | [b] University Lyon 1, Lyon, France | [c] Neurelec, 2720 Chemin Saint-Bernard, Vallauris, France | [d] Audiology and ENT Department, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Lyon, France
Correspondence: [*] Corresponding author: Arnaud Jeanvoine, INSERM U1028, CNRS UMR5292, Centre de Recherche en Neurosciences de Lyon, Equipe PACS, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Pavillon U, 5 Place d'Arsonval, F-69437 Lyon cedex 03, France. Tel.: +33 4 72 11 05 03; Fax: +33 4 72 11 05 04; E-mail:arnaudjeanvoine@yahoo.fr
Abstract: French phonemes perception in noisy conditions, in the case of a Binaural Cochlear Implant (BCI) coding, is seen in the present study. In the current work, the action of binaural noise reduction algorithms is investigated, through the use of a vocoder simulation with normal hearing listeners. Three binaural noise reduction algorithms, used in classical hearing aids, have been considered: beamformer, Doerbecker algorithm combined with Ephraim and Malah noise estimator and Doerbecker algorithm combined with Scalart noise estimator. Then a cochlear implant (CI) coding (bins grouped into frequency bands) transformed the signal at the end of the processing chain. Also, a percentage of the input signal was ``re-injected'' (added) before CI coding. Twenty-six normal hearing subjects participated in the experiment and they listened to sessions including 3 signal-to-noise ratios, 3 re-injection coefficients; they evaluated the coded signal (phoneme recognition). Then, a noise was added to jam the signal. The noise came from five different noise angles and the speech was issued from the front (zero deg azimuth). Altogether, experimental sessions tested 150 conditions. Best results were obtained using the beamformer algorithm. Doerbecker with Ephraim and Malah estimator led to good results; this strategy was more efficient than the Doerbecker with Scalart estimator. Results were more sensitive to the speech processing strategy than to the noise angle. Re-injection of the input signal improved the recognition. In this BCI coding environment, noise reduction algorithms led to an improvement of 20% in phoneme recognition.
Keywords: Binaural signal processing, noise reduction algorithms, Binaural Cochlear Implant, vocoder coding, front target, noise angle, French phonemes recognition
DOI: 10.3233/TAD-150423
Journal: Technology and Disability, vol. 27, no. 1-2, pp. 51-63, 2015
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
sales@iospress.com
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
info@iospress.nl
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office info@iospress.nl
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
china@iospress.cn
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: editorial@iospress.nl