Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Mézière, Anthonya; b; * | Goursot, Catherinea | Schonheit, Clairea | Curtis, Valentinea | Moreau, Carolinea | Golmard, Jean-Louisc; d | Thébault, Jean Laurente | Pasqui, Vivianef
Affiliations: [a] Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, GHU La Pitié Salpêtrière-Charles Foix, Soins de Suite et Réadaptation Orthogériatrique, Ivry sur Seine, France | [b] DHU FAST, Paris, France | [c] Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, GHU La Pitié Salpêtrière-Charles Foix, Service de Biostatistiques, Paris, France | [d] Université Paris 6, Paris, France | [e] Département de Médecine Générale, Faculté de Médecine Paris Descartes, Paris, France | [f] Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Institut des Systèmes Intelligents et de Robotique ISIR, Paris, France
Correspondence: [*] Corresponding author: Anthony Mézière, Service de Soins de Suite et Réadaptation Orthogériatrique, GHU La Pitié Salpêtrière Charles Foix, site Charles Foix, 7 avenue de la République, 94 205 Ivry sur Seine, France. Tel: +33 149 594 585; Fax: +33 149 594 698; E-mail: anthony.meziere@aphp.fr.
Abstract: BACKGROUND: To avoid falls in older adults, current solution is compensation using mobility aids. OBJECTIVE: Evaluating satisfaction of older adults with follow-up from their general practitioner and physiotherapist regarding their mobility aid. METHODS: A telephone survey was carried using a satisfaction questionnaire in 86 patients aged 87 +/- 6 years discharged from rehabilitation department of Hôpital Charles Foix, France. RESULTS: Participants were satisfied with the follow-up from their general practitioner (78%) and their physiotherapist (93%) regarding their mobility aid. They judged the professionals competent, respectively 52% and 62%. Less than 50% of participants reported receiving advice and encouragement from the professionals regarding their mobility aid. The physiotherapist was preferred to the general practitioner regarding follow-up for the mobility aid. Follow-up of the professionals did not influence any change in mobility aid, which the patients determined themselves in two-thirds of cases. CONCLUSIONS: Participants were satisfied with the follow-up by the general practitioner and physiotherapist regarding mobility aids, nevertheless, their follow-up demands of professionals, were superficial as they did not truly use them as resources. General Practitioners, physiotherapists and relatives’ help have to communicate with each other to properly influence changes of mobility aid in elderly people at home.
Keywords: Mobility, aid physiotherapist, general practitioner, older subject
DOI: 10.3233/TAD-180200
Journal: Technology and Disability, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 199-208, 2019
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
sales@iospress.com
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
info@iospress.nl
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office info@iospress.nl
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
china@iospress.cn
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: editorial@iospress.nl