Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: van der Heide, Loek A.a; b; * | Ramakers, Ingec | Essers, Johannes M.N.c | Gelderblom, Gert Jana | de Witte, Luc P.d | Meijer, Kennethc
Affiliations: [a] Research Center for Technology in Care, Zuyd University of Applied Sciences, Heerlen, The Netherlands | [b] School for Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands | [c] Department of Human Movement Sciences, School for Nutrition, Toxicology and Metabolism, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands | [d] Centre for Assistive Technology and Connected Healthcare, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
Correspondence: [*] Corresponding author: Loek van der Heide, Lectoraat Technologie in de Zorg, Zuyd Hogeschool, Henri Dunantstraat 2, 6219 PB Heerlen, The Netherlands. E-mail: Loek.vanderheide@zuyd.nl.
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Understanding how dynamic arm supports affect the ability to perform activities of daily living (ADL) in daily life situations is essential for improved prescription. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the newly developed MMAAS is a useful tool to assess the RoM at home. Secondly, to investigate differences in RoM and ADL performance with and without dynamic arm support. METHODS: Five dynamic arm support users performed nine activities with and without dynamic arm support at home. A reference group of five participants was included. Shoulder and elbow RoM were assessed for the three most difficult tasks. RESULTS: The measurement of the elbow joint RoM appeared unreliable. In most participants shoulder RoM increased with dynamic arm support, but the magnitude of change differed. Variation was also found regarding whether people could perform ADL with and without support. CONCLUSIONS: In its current state the MMAAS is not regarded a useful tool for assessing the RoM in the domestic setting. The ability to perform ADL and RoM seem influenced by the environment, users’ needs and abilities. Future studies investigating effects and benefits of dynamic arm supports should be conducted in a broader daily life context.
Keywords: Activities of daily living, assistive technology, biomechanics, domestic setting, dynamic arm supports, motion analysis, neuromuscular disorders, rehabilitation, stroke, upper extremity
DOI: 10.3233/TAD-160157
Journal: Technology and Disability, vol. 29, no. 1-2, pp. 91-99, 2017
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
sales@iospress.com
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
info@iospress.nl
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office info@iospress.nl
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
china@iospress.cn
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: editorial@iospress.nl