Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Sveistrup, Heidia; b; * | Lockett, Donnab | Edwards, Nancyb; c | Aminzadeh, Faranakb; d
Affiliations: [a] School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada | [b] Community Health Research Unit, Ottawa, ON, Canada | [c] School of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada | [d] Regional Geriatric Assessment Program of Ottawa-Carleton, Ottawa, ON, Canada
Correspondence: [*] Address for correspondence: Heidi Sveistrup, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, 451 Smyth Road, Ottawa, ON, Canada K1H 8M5. Tel.: +1 613 562 5800 (8016); Fax: +1 613 562 5428; E-mail: Heidi.Sveistrup@uottawa.ca.
Abstract: The patterns of use, perceived usefulness and perceived safety of five different configurations of bathtub grab bars were evaluated by 103 community-living seniors in Canada. Current bathing activities, fall history, sociodemographic characteristics, balance measures as well as details about the home bathing environment were recorded. Participants were then videotaped as they got into, sat down, got up and exited a bath tub using each of the five configurations. The videotapes were used to determine the pattern of grab bar use for each configuration and participants ranked each configuration for perceived function and safety. The five configurations corresponded to standards published by the Canadian Standards Association, the US Uniform Accessibility Standards, a modification of the Ontario Building code (OBC, a Canadian provincial code), a “common configuration” and a composite configuration. Although most respondents did not have bathtub grab bars installed in their home, those with home bars reported that they used the bars on a regular basis. Significant differences in mean ratings of safety, comfort, ease of use, helpfulness, likelihood of use, and total composite score were detected between configurations with the modified OBC configuration consistently ranked least favourable. There were no statistically significant relationships between the respondents' profiles, their preferred configurations or their patterns of bar use. A series of recommendations and suggestions for future research are made.
Keywords: Aging, assistive devices, bathing
DOI: 10.3233/TAD-2006-18201
Journal: Technology and Disability, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 45-55, 2006
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
sales@iospress.com
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
info@iospress.nl
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office info@iospress.nl
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
china@iospress.cn
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: editorial@iospress.nl