You are viewing a javascript disabled version of the site. Please enable Javascript for this site to function properly.
Go to headerGo to navigationGo to searchGo to contentsGo to footer
In content section. Select this link to jump to navigation

Developing Households' sub-sectors accounts: Pros and cons of the top-down and the bottom-up methods

Abstract

The last decade debate on progress and well-being has stressed the necessity of putting people first, also within the national accounts (NAs) system. The sub-sectoring of Households accounts by groups of households would certainly represent a way of pursuing such objective. Two methods can be used: the top-down method, which breaks down NAs totals (top) according to a set of indicators derived from micro data on household economic resources; the bottom-up method, which uses micro data (bottom) to derive NAs totals. In this paper, we discuss pros and cons of the two methods especially from a practical point of view. Particularly, we present an application of the top-down method for Italy and describe the on-going process towards a full-fledged bottom-up approach for the building of Italian National Accounts.

References

[1] 

UNECE. Canberra Group Handbook on Household Income Statistics; Geneva, (2011) ; Available from: www.unece.org.

[2] 

Stiglitz Commission. Report on the measurement of economic performance and social progress; (2009) . Available from: www.stiglitz-sen-fitoussi.fr.

[3] 

Stoker T., Empirical approaches to the problem of aggregation over individuals, Journal of Economic Literature 31: (4) ((1993) ).

[4] 

Ruggles N.D., and Ruggles R., The Role of Microdata in the National Economic Accounts, Review of Income and Wealth 21: (2) ((1975) ).

[5] 

United Nations, SNA (1995) .

[6] 

United Nations, SNA (2010) .

[7] 

Eurostat, European System of Accounts, ESA (2010) .

[8] 

Fesseau M., , Wolff F., and Mattonetti M.L., A cross-country comparison of household income, consumption and wealth between micro sources and national accounts aggregates, OECD Statistics Working Papers, No. 2013/04, OECD Publishing, (2013) .

[9] 

Fesseau M., and Mattonetti M.L., Distributional Measures Across Household Groups in a National Accounts Framework: Results from an Experimental Cross-country Exercise on Household Income, Consumption and Saving. OECD Statistics Working Papers, No. 2013/04, OECD Publishing, (2013) .

[10] 

Fesseau M., and Van de Ven P., Measuring inequality in income and consumption in a national accounts framework, Statistics Brief, Oecd n. 19, (2014) .

[11] 

Adler H.J., and Wolfson M., A prototype micro-macro link from the Canadian household sector, Review of Income and Wealth 34: (4) ((1988) ).

[12] 

Fesseau M., , Raynaud E., , Le Laidier S., and Bournay J., Building a household-subcategories accounting system using French Micro and Macro statistics, IARIW 30th General Conference, Portoroz, Slovenia, August 24-30, (2008) .

[13] 

Mc Cully C.P., , Integration of Micro and Macro Data on Consumer Income and Expenditures in: Measuring Economic Sustainability and Progress: NBER Book Series Studies in Income and Wealth, Jorgenson D.W., , Landefeld S., and Schreyer P., eds, (2014) .

[14] 

Ruggles N.D., and Ruggles R., A Strategy for merging and matching microdata sets, Annals of Economic and Social Measurement 3: (2) ((1974) ).

[15] 

Fellegi I.P., and Sunter A.B., A theory for record linkage, Journal of the American Statistical Association 64: ((1969) ), 1183-1210.

[16] 

Coli A., , Colombini S., , Di Zio M., , D'Orazio M., , Faiella I., , Siciliani I., , Sacco G., , Scanu M., and Tartamella F., La costruzione di un Archivio di microdati sulle famiglie italiane ottenuto integrando l'indagine ISTAT sui consumi delle famiglie italiane e l'Indagine Banca d'Italia sui bilanci delle famiglie italiane, Istat, Contributi, (2006) .

[17] 

D'Orazio M., , Di Zio M., and Scanu M., Statistical matching: Theory and Practice. Wiley & Sons. New York, (2006) .

[18] 

Rässler S., Statistical matching: a frequentist theory, practical applications and alternative Bayesian approaches, Lecture notes in statistics, 168 - New York Springer, (2002) .

[19] 

Rodger W.L., An evaluation of statistical matching, Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 2: (1) ((1984) ).

[20] 

Singh A.C., , Mantel H., , Kinack M., and Rowe G., Statistical matching: Use of auxiliary information as an alternative to the conditional independence assumption, Survey Methodology 19: ((1993) ), 59-79.

[21] 

Bank of Italy ((2006) ) Italian Households budgets in the year 2004, Supplementi al Bollettino Statistico, Indagini campionarie, Anno XVI Numero 7-17 Gennaio 2006.

[22] 

Istat. Households consumption expenditures, year 2004, Annuario n. 11, (2006) .

[23] 

Istat. Cross sectional UDB (User Data Base) IT-SILC 2005 -Version: 2005-1 del 22-11-2007.

[24] 

Donatiello G., , D'Orazio M., , Frattarola D., , Rizzi A., , Scanu M., and Spaziani M., The role of the auxiliary information in Statistical Matching Income and Consumption, New Techniques and Technologies for Statistics (NTTS), Bruxelles; 02/2015, (2015) .

[25] 

Eurostat, Handbook on social accounting matrices and labour accounts, Eurostat Working paper, Population and social conditions 3/2003/E/N°23, (2003) .

[26] 

Stone R., , Champernowne D.C., and Meade J., The precision of national income estimates, Review of Economic Studies 9: (2) ((1942) ).

[27] 

De Gregorio C., and Giordano A., The heterogeneity of irregular employment in Italy: some evidence from the Labour force survey integrated with administrative data. Istat working papers n.1/(2015) .

[28] 

Eurostat-OECD, Compilation guide on land estimation, (2015) .

[29] 

Istat, The stock of non-financial assets by institutional sector, (2015) .

[30] 

Agenzia delle entrate. Gli immobili in Italia (yearly relases), http://www.agenziaentrate.gov.it/wps/content/Nsilib/Nsi/Agenzia/Agenzia+comunica/Prodotti+editoriali/Pubblicazioni+cartografia_catasto_mercato_immobiliare/Immobili+in+ Italia/.