Affiliations: [a]
Biomedical Imaging Center, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY, USA
| [b]
GE Research, One Research Circle, Niskayuna, NY, USA
Correspondence:
[*]
Corresponding author: Ge Wang, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY 12180 USA. E-mail: wangg6@rpi.edu.
Abstract: Dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) acquires two x-ray projection datasets with different x-ray energy spectra, performs material-specific image reconstruction based on the energy-dependent non-linear integral model, and provides more accurate quantification of attenuation coefficients than single energy spectrum CT. In the diagnostic energy range, x-ray energy-dependent attenuation is mainly caused by photoelectric absorption and Compton scattering. Theoretically, these two physical components of the x-ray attenuation mechanism can be determined from two projection datasets with distinct energy spectra. Practically, the solution of the non-linear integral equation is complicated due to spectral uncertainty, detector sensitivity, and data noise. Conventional multivariable optimization methods are prone to local minima. In this paper, we develop a new method for DECT image reconstruction in the projection domain. This method combines an analytic solution of a polynomial equation and a univariate optimization to solve the polychromatic non-linear integral equation. The polynomial equation of an odd order has a unique real solution with sufficient accuracy for image reconstruction, and the univariate optimization can achieve the global optimal solution, allowing accurate and stable projection decomposition for DECT. Numerical and physical phantom experiments are performed to demonstrate the effectiveness of the method in comparison with the state-of-the-art projection decomposition methods. As a result, the univariate optimization method yields a quality improvement of 15% for image reconstruction and substantial reduction of the computational time, as compared to the multivariable optimization methods.
