Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Crizzle, Alexander M. | Classen, Sherrilene | Lanford, Desiree N. | Malaty, Irene A. | Okun, Michael S. | Wang, Yanning | Wagle Shukla, Aparna | Rodriguez, Ramon L. | McFarland, Nikolaus R.
Affiliations: Department of Occupational Therapy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA | Center for Movement Disorders and Neurorestoration, Department of Neurology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
Note: [] Correspondence to: Alexander M. Crizzle, PhD, MPH, Department of Occupational Therapy, College of Public Health and Health Professions, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32601-0164 USA. Tel.: +1 416 273 6136; Fax: +1 416 273 6042; E-mail: acrizzle@sympatico.ca
Abstract: Background: The primary influence of motor symptoms on driving performance remains unclear due to the inconsistent use of various motor rating scales used in prior studies. Objective: This study aimed to determine which of three measures utilized in PD, the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) motor section; the Modified Hoehn and Yahr; and the Rapid Paced Walk Test would best predict pass/fail outcomes on a road test in a sample of PD drivers. Methods: All participants (N = 55; 79% men) completed a road test. Receiver Operating Characteristics were then contrasted for all subjects based on assessments from all three disease severity indices. MMSE scores were then modelled with significant disease severity measures (if any) to determine if the predictive accuracy could be improved. Results: The Rapid Paced Walk Test and the Modified Hoehn & Yahr both predicted pass/fail outcomes on the road test (Area under the curve of 0.73 and 0.82, respectively). UPDRS motor scores, however, did not predict safe driving. When optimal cut-off points on the Modified Hoehn & Yahr (≥2.5) and Rapid Paced Walk Test (>6.22 seconds) were modelled with MMSE scores indicative of mild cognitive impairment (<27), the model accurately classified 92% and 100% as failing the road test, respectively. Conclusion: Although the Rapid Paced Walk Test had a slight advantage in differentiating between pass/fail outcomes compared to the Modified Hoehn & Yahr, both tests alone cannot be used in isolation to predict driving safety. Predictive accuracy can be improved using both select cut-off points on the Modified Hoehn & Yahr and Rapid Paced Walk test with MMSE scores in PD drivers. Though these findings are useful, an on-road test is still the gold standard, and screening should always be followed by formal testing.
Keywords: Automobile driving, Parkinson's disease, gait/postural balance, cognition
DOI: 10.3233/JPD-120152
Journal: Journal of Parkinson's Disease, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 153-160, 2013
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
sales@iospress.com
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
info@iospress.nl
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office info@iospress.nl
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
china@iospress.cn
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: editorial@iospress.nl