Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Beglinger, Leigh J.; | Adams, William H. | Langbehn, Douglas | Fiedorowicz, Jess G. | Caviness, John | Biglan, Kevin | Olson, Blair | Paulsen, Jane S.
Affiliations: University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA | Elks Rehab Hospital, Boise, ID, USA | Loyola University Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA | Mayo Clinic Scottsdale, Scottsdale, AZ, USA | University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA
Note: [] Statistical analysis: William Adams, MA and Douglas Langbehn, MD, PhD conducted the biostatistical analyses for the study. Correspondence to: Leigh Beglinger, Elks Rehab Hospital, 600N. Robbins Rd, Boise, ID 83701, USA. Tel.: +1 208 489 4582; E-mail: lbeglinger@elksrehab.org
Note: [] Statistical analysis: William Adams, MA and Douglas Langbehn, MD, PhD conducted the biostatistical analyses for the study.
Abstract: Background: “Practice effects” (PE), or performance improvements due to prior exposure to testing, are known to confound cognitive test results, particularly when short intervals occur between two test sessions. Objective: We examined two subsamples with short or long re-test intervals from a recent clinical trial. Methods: Thirty-four non-depressed adults with mild Huntington Disease (HD) participated. Three cognitive tests were administered at screening and again at baseline, before active treatment randomization. Half the sample had a 24-hour retest interval while the other half was >6-days. Results: The two groups differed on demographic/clinical factors (age, Total Motor Score and Total Functional Capacity). After controlling for age and motor score, PE differences were found on three of the five UHDRS cognitive tests: the longer interval group showed larger PE on Symbol-Digit Modalities and Stroop color, while the rapid interval group had larger PE on Stroop interference. Controlling for screening cognitive performance yielded similar results. Conclusions: Length of interval between screening and baseline visits and level of disease severity may influence stability of UHDRS cognitive test results in clinical trials in HD.
Keywords: Huntington disease, neuropsychological assessment, cognitive disorders/dementia, practice effects
DOI: 10.3233/JHD-140100
Journal: Journal of Huntington's Disease, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 139-144, 2014
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
sales@iospress.com
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
info@iospress.nl
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office info@iospress.nl
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
china@iospress.cn
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: editorial@iospress.nl