Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Celik, Evrim Coskuna; * | Yalcinkaya, Ebru Yilmaza | Atamaz, Fundab | Karatas, Metinc | Ones, Kadriyed | Sezer, Tezguld | Eren, Imrane | Paker, Nurdand | Gning, Ibrahimaf | Mendoza, Titof | Cleeland, Charles S.f
Affiliations: [a] GOP Taksim Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey | [b] Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Department, Faculty of Medicine, Ege University, Izmir, Turkey | [c] Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Department, Faculty of Medicine, Baskent University, Ankara, Turkey | [d] Istanbul Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey | [e] Bagcilar Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey | [f] Anderson Cancer Center, University of Texas, Houston, TX, USA
Correspondence: [*] Corresponding author: Evrim Coskun Celik, Ağaoğlu My World Europe sitesi A6 Daire 113 Ziya Gökalp Mh. Başakşehir/İstanbul Istanbul 34306, Turkey. Tel.: +90 0535 5495989; Fax: +90 0216 4416936; E-mail:evrimcoskuncelik@gmail.com
Abstract: BACKGROUND: The Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) is both a questionnaire and an outcome measure that is used widely in clinical trials to assess pain associated with many conditions. The BPI Short Form has been extensively translated into foreign languages. The aim of this study was to assess the validity and reliability of a Turkish Brief Pain Inventory Short Form (BPI-TR) to evaluate musculoskeletal pain. METHODS: In total, 297 patients with musculoskeletal pain participated in the study. Demographic characteristics and brief medical histories were recorded. Pain intensity was assessed using a visual analogue scale (VAS) and quality-of-life was assessed using the Short Form 36 (SF-36). Pain was evaluated using the BPI-TR in all patients. Internal consistency and test-retest analysis were used to assess reliability. The internal consistency of the scale items was assessed by calculating Cronbach's α value, which was expected to be > 0.7. The criterion validity of the BPI-TR was assessed by correlation with VAS scores. RESULTS: Pain intensity, pain interference, and other components of the Turkish version were consistent with validity thereof. Cronbach's α was 0.84 for pain intensity and 0.89 for pain interference. The extent of BPI-TR and VAS correlation was statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: The BPI-TR may be used for assessment of musculoskeletal pain.
Keywords: Pain assessment instrument, Brief Pain Inventory, musculoskeletal pain
DOI: 10.3233/BMR-160738
Journal: Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 229-233, 2017
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
sales@iospress.com
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
info@iospress.nl
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office info@iospress.nl
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
china@iospress.cn
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: editorial@iospress.nl