Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Review Article
Authors: Gopal, Hari* | Fitzgerald, Joseph | McCrory, Connail
Affiliations: Department of Pain Medicine, St. James's Hospital and Institute of Neuroscience, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland
Correspondence: [*] Corresponding author: Hari Gopal, Department of Pain Medicine, St. James's Hospital and Institute of Neuroscience, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland. Tel.: +353 87 2181697; E-mail:doc_harigopal@yahoo.com
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is used for the treatment of chronic neuropathic pain, a notoriously difficult condition to treat. Failed Back Surgery Syndrome (FBSS) and Complex Regional Pain syndrome (CRPS) remain the strongest indications. Funding remains a difficult issue and the use of trial of stimulation is the traditional method of ensuring best outcomes from implantation. METHODS: A retrospective and consecutive review of 80 cases of spinal cord stimulation for patients with a diagnosis of FBSS and CRPS having undergone prior comprehensive medical management and interventional treatment with no sustained benefit. Trial of stimulation was performed on-table and if acceptable coverage was achieved, the case proceeded to full implantation. RESULTS: The mean patient age was 50.08 years (range 28-80 years). At 12 months follow-up, thirty two patients (40%) no longer required analgesic medication. Thirty patients (37.5%) reported their pain was manageable with first line analgesics. Fourteen (17.5%) reported their pain was manageable first line analgesic and occasional tramadol or codeine. Four (5%) reported that their pain was manageable with NSAID's, paracetamol, amitriptyline, and regular codeine or tramadol. Seventeen out of eighty patients (21.25%) were unemployed before SCS implant, and at 12 months follow up eight of these patients (47.05%) had returned to work. There was no infective complications or explants. Two patients (2.53%) required one lead revision, which was successful. CONCLUSION: SCS is the most effective treatment for FBSS and CRPS, which is proven resistant to medical management. On-table trial and implantation is easy to perform with good success rate and low morbidity and if successful will reduce complication rates, especially infection.
Keywords: CRPS, FBSS, spinal cord stimulation
DOI: 10.3233/BMR-150608
Journal: Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 7-13, 2016
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
sales@iospress.com
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
info@iospress.nl
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office info@iospress.nl
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
china@iospress.cn
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: editorial@iospress.nl