Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Hofmann, Ulf Kristera; * | Keller, Ramona Luisea; b | von Bernstorff, Maximiliana; c | Walter, Christiana | Mittag, Falka
Affiliations: [a] Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Hospital of Tübingen, D-72076 Tübingen, Germany | [b] Faculty of Medicine, Julius-Maximilians University of Würzburg, D-97080 Würzburg, Germany | [c] Faculty of Medicine, Eberhard-Karls University of Tübingen, D-72076 Tübingen, Germany
Correspondence: [*] Corresponding author: Ulf Krister Hofmann, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Hospital of Tübingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Strasse 3, D-72076 Tübingen, Germany. Tel.: +49 7071 29 86685; Fax: +49 7071 29 4091; E-mail: ulf.hofmann@med.uni-tuebingen.de.
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Numerous classification systems have been proposed to interpret lumbar MRI scans. The clinical impact of the measured parameters remains unclear. To evaluate the clinical significance of imaging results in patients with multisegmental degenerative pathologies, treating specialists can perform image-guided local injections to target defined areas such as the epidural space. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the correlation between lumbar spinal stenosis measurements obtained by MRI and improvement obtained through local epidural injection. METHODS: In this retrospective study various measurement and classification systems for lumbar spinal stenosis were applied to MRI scans of 100 patients with this pathological condition. The reported effect of epidural bupivacaine/triamcinolone injections at the site was recorded in these patients and a comparative analysis performed. RESULTS: MRI features assessed in this study did not show any relevant correlation with reported pain relief after epidural injection in patients with chronic lumbar stenosis, with the exception of posterior disc height with a weak Kendall’s tau of -0.187 (p= 0.009). CONCLUSIONS: Although MRI is crucial for evaluating lumbar spinal stenosis, it cannot replace but is rather complementary to a good patient history and clinical examination or the results of local diagnostic injections.
Keywords: Lumbar spinal stenosis, MRI, epidural injection, neuroforaminal stenosis, Schizas’ spinal stenosis classification, Sipola’s neuroforaminal cross-sectional area
DOI: 10.3233/BMR-181249
Journal: Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 613-621, 2020
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
sales@iospress.com
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
info@iospress.nl
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office info@iospress.nl
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
china@iospress.cn
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: editorial@iospress.nl