Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: del Pozo-Cruz, Borjaa; b; * | Mocholi, Miguel H.b | del Pozo-Cruz, Jesusc | Parraca, Jose A.b | Adsuar, Jose C.b | Gusi, Narcisb
Affiliations: [a] Department of Sport and Exercise Science, Faculty of Science, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand | [b] Faculty of Sport and Exercise Science, University of Extremadura, Caceres, Spain | [c] Department of Physical Education and Sport, Faculty of Education, University of Seville, Seville, Spain
Correspondence: [*] Corresponding author: Borja del Pozo-Cruz, Department of Sport and Exercise Science, University of Auckland, Building 731 room 340, Tamaki Innovation Campus, 261 Morrin Rd, St Johns, Auckland Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand. Tel.: +64 9 373 7599 ext. 86990; E-mail: b.delpozocruz@auckland.ac.nz
Abstract: Background and Objective:Despite the widespread use of trunk endurance tests, the reliability and validity of these tests in office workers with subacute nonspecific low back pain are unknown. Materials and Methods:This cross-sectional study involved 190 subjects: 30 men and 42 women without low back pain and 47 men and 71 women with low back pain. All subjects underwent timed prone and supine isometric lumbar and abdominal trunk endurance tests that were performed until subjective fatigue occurred. All subjects also completed the Roland Morris and Oswestry self-reported disability questionnaires. A test-retest study (7 days) was conducted with 31 participants with low back pain from the study. Results:For the abdominal trunk endurance test, males and females with low back pain had mean (SD) values of 62.06 (36.87) and 46.06 (29.28) seconds, respectively, both significantly lower than the asymptomatic workers. For the lumbar test, males and females with low back pain had mean (SD) values of 79.57 (30.66) and 75.49 (28.97) seconds, respectively, again, both significantly lower than the asymptomatic workers. The intraclass correlation coefficients of both tests exceeded 0.90 and the Kappa indices were excellent for both men and women. Receiver-operating curve analyses revealed areas under the curve very close to or exceeding 0.70 for both men and women for both tests. Conclusions:The lumbar and abdominal trunk muscle endurance tests appeared to be reliable and valid measures in office workers with subacute low back pain.
Keywords: Backache, lower back pain, occupational assessment, monitoring
DOI: 10.3233/BMR-140460
Journal: Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 399-408, 2014
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
sales@iospress.com
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
info@iospress.nl
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office info@iospress.nl
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
china@iospress.cn
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: editorial@iospress.nl