Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Bybee, Ronald F.a; * | Mamantov, Jasynb | Meekins, Willc | Witt, Jasond | Byars, Allyne | Greenwood, Mikef
Affiliations: [a] Physical Therapy Department, Angelo State University, San Angelo, TX, USA | [b] Ace Home Healthcare, Joshua, TX, USA | [c] Senior Care Health and Rehab, Coppell, TX, USA | [d] Your Health Team, Rowlett, TX, USA | [e] Kinesiology Department, Angelo State University, San Angelo, TX, USA | [f] Health, Human Performance and Recreation Department, Baylor University, Waco, TX, USA
Correspondence: [*] Address for correspondence: Dr. Ron Bybee, Angelo State University, Department of Physical Therapy, ASU Station #10923, San Angelo, TX 76909, USA. Tel.: +1 325 942 2579; Fax: +1 325 942 2548; E-mail: rbybee@angelo.edu
Abstract: Purpose:To compare range of motion (ROM) outcomes of repeated extension versus static stretching of the lumbar spine in healthy adults. Methods:101 subjects volunteered and were randomly assigned to 1of 3 groups: repeated extension (Group A, n = 33), static stretching (Group B, n = 36), or control (Group C, n = 32). Double inclinometers were used to measure lumbar extension ROM (prone). Measurements were taken at baseline, 4 weeks, and 8 weeks. MANOVA assessed equivalence of the 3 groups for age and initial ROM; chi-square testing assessed gender differences. ROM data were assessed using General Linear Mixed Model Analysis. Alpha was set at 0.05. Results:Both methods of stretching increased lumbar extension ROM at 4 and 8 weeks. The repeated stretching group increased ROM more than the static group. Group A differences were significant comparing 8 to 4 weeks and to baseline. Group B differences were also significant comparing 8 to 4 weeks and to baseline. At 8 weeks, only group A was significantly different than the control group. Conclusion:Repeated and static stretching improved lumbar extension ROM when compared to no stretching. However, repeated extension when compared to static stretching showed greater gains in lumbar extension ROM after 8 weeks of stretching.
Keywords: Range of motion, flexibility, low back
DOI: 10.3233/BMR-2008-21302
Journal: Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 153-159, 2008
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
sales@iospress.com
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
info@iospress.nl
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office info@iospress.nl
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
china@iospress.cn
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: editorial@iospress.nl