Low Xanthophylls, Retinol, Lycopene, and Tocopherols in Grey and White Matter of Brains with Alzheimer’s Disease

Risk for dementia/AD

Those who closely followed the MIND diet (emphasizing higher intake of antioxidant-rich fruits, vegetables, legumes, nuts, and fish and minimal meat, dairy, and sweets) had significantly lower risk for AD [26, 27], better cognitive function prior to death, and less AD-related brain pathology [3]. Higher intake of total carotenoids or lutein/zeaxanthin over more than a decade was associated with almost 50% lower risk for an AD diagnosis and less global brain pathology; lutein/zeaxanthin intake was inversely correlated with AD diagnostic score, neuritic plaque severity, as well as neurofibrillary tangle density and severity [28]. Higher circulating levels of lutein and/or zeaxanthin and/or lycopene were associated with lower risk for dementia among 1,094 older French subjects [29] and lower risk for AD mortality in the NHANES study [30]. Greater dietary intake of carotenoids was correlated with better cognitive performance, lower risk for AD, and less severity of brain pathology in the Rush Memory and Aging Project [3, 28]. These observations are consistent with reports that those with higher levels of total carotenoids in diet, serum or plasma had slower cognitive decline [31], fewer white matter lesions [32, 33], less brain atrophy [34], and lower risk for AD diagnosis or less brain pathology [28, 35]. Higher gamma-tocopherol levels in AD brains were associated with lower Aβ and lower severity of neurofibrillary tangles [36]; higher levels were also associated with higher levels of six presynaptic proteins [37].

Despite its obvious relevance, little is known about carotenoid levels in brains with dementia or AD. Healthy elderly human brains contain more than 16 carotenoids and 66–77% of them are xanthophylls, dominated by β-cryptoxanthin, lutein, anhydrolutein, and zeaxanthin. [38]. Lutein and β-carotene concentrations were significantly lower in brains of elderly donors with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) than in those with normal cognition [39]. In contrast, donor brains with nominally identified AD had only slightly (nonsignificant) lower concentrations of all carotenoids [40]. This investigation tested the hypothesis that concentrations of lutein and zeaxanthin, one or more other carotenoid, and one or more tocopherols are lower in brains with confirmed AD than in healthy elderly brains of comparable age.

Donor brains

Coded samples of frozen human brain were obtained from the Massachusetts Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center at the Massachusetts General Hospital, where the presence or absence of neuropathology in each sample was confirmed by microscopic examination. All study subjects or next of kin gave informed consent for the brain donation to MGH, where the protocol was approved by MGH Institutional Review Board. Upon receipt at the brain bank, the brains were dissected, and 0.5 cm sections were placed on cards, frozen on dry ice, and maintained at –80°C. Brain samples obtained from the Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center included regions in which AD lesions were thought to occur earlier and from regions thought to remain less affected by AD. Samples were shipped on dry ice and maintained at –80°C until extraction and analysis at Craft Technologies. The study of these samples was done in accord with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975 and approved by the Institutional Review Board of Schepens Eye Research, the Miami Miller School of Medicine at Florida Atlantic University, and Carilion Clinic.

The average age of all brains was 74.93±10.2 years; five brains (33.3%) were female and ten (66.6%) were male. The average age of healthy brains was 78.4±1.9 years as compared to 73.2±10.7 years average for the AD brains (N.S.). The percent of male donors was higher for brains with confirmed AD (70%) than for the healthy brains (60%). Average postmortem times were 12.1.±4.5 h for AD brains and 14.5±6.4 h for the healthy elderly (HE) brains (N.S.). Samples were retrieved from brain slices that had been stored at –80°C for prolonged periods (AD = 14.5±4.5 years; HE = 13.3±0.6 years, NS). Age, gender, and Broadman region of these samples are summarized in Table 1.

Sample processing and analysis

Each human brain sample was dissected into white and grey matter, and a 1–3 g sample was weighed and placed in a mortar. The tissue was ground with a pestle immediately after adding approximately 0.5 g of sodium sulfate, and again after addition of 7 ml of hexane:ethyl acetate (90:10). The solvent was transferred to a glass funnel containing a glass fiber filter, and the filtrate collected in a 25 ml volumetric flask. The extraction was repeated until the volumetric was full. The extracts were dried under a stream of nitrogen gas. The dried extract was sonicated for 30 min in a mixture of 1 ml of 40% potassium hydroxide in methanol and 500μL of 10% pyrogallol in ethanol solution. Following addition of 2.5 ml of water and 5 ml of hexane:ethyl acetate solution, the mixture was vortexed for 45 s and the organic layer collected; the extraction was repeated two more times. The extract was washed twice with water and dried under nitrogen gas. The analytes were dissolved in 25μl of ethyl acetate and vortexed for 20 s, diluted with 75μl of mobile phase, vortexed again for 15 s, and sonicated for 15 s. The extract was transferred to a conical vial and centrifuged before HPLC, performed as previously described in detail [38, 41].

Xanthophyll composition was further examined in unsaponified brains extracted with combinations of organic solvents (tert-butyl methyl ether (MTBE), sodium dodecylsulfate, hexane, tetrohydrofuran), dried, re-dissolved in hexane/MTBE, and separated by normal HPLC using an ES Industries Diol 4×150 mm column and a hexane/dioxane gradient with tocol and β−apo-8’-carotenoate as standards. Carotenoids were measured by absorbance at 450 nm.

To determine meso-zeaxanthin content, brain samples extracted with MTBE were separated by normal phase chromatography using a Diol column with a hexane/dioxane gradient. The zeaxanthin fraction was collected, dried, diluted with the mobile phase (6% isopropanol in hexane), and separated by chiral HPLC using a Chiralpak AD 4.6×250 mm, 10 mm column and an isopropanol/hexane flow rate of 1.0 ml/min.

External standards used for quantification included: zeaxanthin, β-cryptoxanthin, and α-carotene (gifts from Hoffman-LaRoche (now DSM, Heerlen Netherlands); lutein (gift from Kemin Industries (Des Moines IA); lycopene and β-carotene from Sigma Chemical Co (St. Louis); retinol and α-tocopherol from US Biochemical (Cleveland OH), and tocol, δ- and γ-tocopherols (gift from Cognis Corporation, Chicago, IL). Response factors of lutein were used to quantify unidentified xanthophylls and 2’, 3’anhydrolutein; α-cryptoxanthin was quantified using the average of lutein and α-carotene response factors. Cis-isomers of lycopene and β-carotene were quantified using the response factors of their trans-isomers. Craft Technologies participated regularly in the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Micronutrient Quality Assurance Program for Fat-Soluble Vitamins.

The carotenoid content of HE brains was previously published [38].

Statistical analysis

Concentrations of analytes in grey and white matter of AD and HE brains are presented as mean±S.E, expressed in pmol/g. Contributions of disease status, region, and brain matter to variance in analyte levels were analyzed by Analysis of Variance and Bonnferroni/Dunn posthoc tests (StatView; SAS Institute, Inc; Cary, NC). The ANOVA was performed on the full data set with samples from at least two regions for each brain, and every data point was associated with age, gender, AD or HE brain, grey or white matter, more or less vulnerable region. Region was consistently insignificant for all variables. Further comparisons of analyte levels in grey matter of HE and AD brains, and levels of lutein or zeaxanthin within a specific brain region were done by t-tests on the data set where regions were averaged so each brain had only two data points— one in grey matter and one in white matter. The initial analysis revealed that only lutein and zeaxanthin had significantly different levels in grey and white matter. For these reasons, the variables were compacted for further Analysis of Variance with repeated measures, so that measures of grey and white and different brain regions were treated as repeated measures from a donor brain. Because of the small number of women in the sample, gender was ignored.

To compare analyte deficiencies in AD brains, the mean concentration of each analyte concentration in HE grey matter and in HE white matter was determined. Then all analytes in grey matter of AD and HE brains were expressed as a percent of their HE means (% HE) in grey matter and repeated for white matter; the mean % HE was determined for each analyte in AD grey or white matter. This analysis was performed on a data set with averaged brain region so that each variable in a donor brain was represented by one data point in grey matter and one in white matter for each analyte.

Extremely high values for almost all analytes in the grey matter from two AD brains were excluded; these were statistically significant outliers for either HE or AD brain samples. Average values in the white matter of the same brain samples further indicated that these data were invalid; dehydration during specimen handling may have caused an artefactual increase in analyte concentrations in the grey matter.

Generalized linear mixed models with a logit link function and random intercepts per subject were used to model disease state as a function of the values of the analytes, separately in white and grey matter. Forward and backward stepwise selection was used to determine an appropriate set of predictors for each of these models. Support vector machines (SVMs, machine learning algorithms that analyze data for classification and regression analysis) were also used to predict disease state. The performance of the SVMs was evaluated using permutation testing with one-hundred random permutations examined.

Permutation testing involves randomly shuffling the labels for “HE” and “AD,” and evaluating the performance of the SVM on the randomly shuffled data. By randomizing the disease labels, we guarantee that any relationships observed between disease state and analytes in the permuted data are due solely to chance. Evaluating the SVM models on these permuted data sets allows us to estimate their performance under the null hypothesis, and by comparing that to their performance on the unpermuted data we can compute a p-value for the hypothesis of no relationship between disease state and the analyte values. Specifically, this p-value is the proportion of times the models fit the permuted data perform better than on the unpermuted data.

Comparisons of AD and HE brain micronutrients

AD brains had significantly lower concentrations of lutein (p = 0.03), zeaxanthin (p = 0.001), anhydrolutein (p = 0.05), lycopene (p = 0.05), retinol (p = 0.006), and α-tocopherol (p = 0.007); γ-tocopherol was significantly lower only in white matter (Fig. 1, Tables 2 and 3). Compared to HE brains, AD brains had higher levels of an unidentified peak with elution and spectral characteristics of a xanthophyll, referred to as xanthophyll metabolite increased in AD (XMiAD; p = 0.006; Table 2). Analysis of variance detected no difference in analyte content of brain regions thought to be affected earlier or later in AD progression.

Lutein and zeaxanthin

Analyte concentrations were higher in grey matter than in white matter but only lutein and zeaxanthin had significantly higher concentrations in grey matter (p = 0.0006 and p = 0.009 respectively; Table 2). The greater abundance in grey matter was not significantly changed in disease; lutein concentration in grey matter of HE and AD brains was 1.8 and 2.0-fold higher than in white matter, and zeaxanthin was 1.7-and 1.8-fold higher (Table 2). Lutein concentrations exceeded zeaxanthin concentrations in both grey and white matter of AD brains (p = 0.003 and p = 0.03 respectively, Fig. 2a); sample size was inadequate to determine significance in HE brains. Zeaxanthin in both white and grey matter was lower in AD brains than in HE brains (p = 0.05 and 0.02, respectively). Lutein tended to be lower in white matter of AD brains (p = 0.08), but not in grey matter (Fig. 2). Healthy brains had 1.5-fold more lutein and 2-fold more zeaxanthin than AD brains suggesting a selective zeaxanthin deficit in AD brains. In fact, the lutein to zeaxanthin ratio was higher in AD brains than in HE brains (Fig. 2b).

Fig. 2

A) Lutein and zeaxanthin concentrations in grey and white matter of HE and AD brains. In AD brains, lutein exceeded zeaxanthin (* above bars); zeaxanthin in grey matter was lower in AD than in HE brains (*in bars). B) Mean L:Z ratio in AD and HE brains. ^*p = 0.02–0.05; ^***p = 0.002; ^****p = 0.00002

Absence of meso-zeaxanthin

Chiral analysis of the zeaxanthin fraction isolated from unsaponified human brain revealed only the 3R-3R’-zeaxanthin found in the normal diet and contaminating lutein. Meso-zeaxanthin (3R-3’S-zeaxanthin) was not detected (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3

Separation of zeaxanthin optical isomers in a racemic mixture and in the brain zeaxanthin fraction collected during normal phase LC. Brain contained only the 3R, 3’R enantiomer of zeaxanthin.

Analyte deficiencies in AD brains

To compare relative deficiency of analytes, the mean concentration of each analyte in HE grey and white matter was determined. Then all analytes in grey matter of AD and HE brains were expressed as a percent of their mean in HE grey matter, and repeated for white matter, and the mean % HE in AD grey matter and white matter was determined for each analyte.

The greatest deficit in AD brains was lycopene (mean only 38.8 % HE, p = 0.04), followed in order by retinol (46.5 % HE, p = 0.003), zeaxanthin (48.9 % HE, p = 0.002), alpha-tocopherol (53.7 % HE, p = 0.003), anhydrolutein and lutein (both 62 % HE); γ-tocopherol was significantly reduced only in white matter (Fig. 4). Smaller deficits in other analytes were not significant. Deficiencies in zeaxanthin and retinol in AD grey matter were striking as only 6% of samples had concentrations that reached the means in HE brains. In contrast, concentration of lycopene (the most deficient analyte in AD brains) was very low or undetectable in half of AD grey matter samples while the concentration in the upper third of samples was higher than the mean lycopene concentration in HE grey or white matter. Almost all analyte concentrations were more depressed in white matter than in grey matter (Fig. 4). For all but five analytes (α- and β-cryptoxanthin, α-carotene, and γ- and δ-tocopherol), the mean concentration in AD grey matter was more than 25% below the mean concentrations in HE grey matter (Fig. 4). Analyte concentrations in AD grey matter were variable; 38–50% of AD brains had individual analytes with a concentration that was greater or equal to their average in HE brains.

Fig. 4

Mean % HE (+S.E.) illustrates relative analyte deficits in AD grey and white matter (dark and light bars, respectively). Asterisks above the bar identify analytes whose % HE in AD brains was significantly below those in HE brains (dashed line); γ-tocopherol was significantly lower only in grey matter (asterisk in the bar). ^*p = 0.02–0.05; ^***p = 0.001–0.004

Brain xanthophyll metabolite increased in AD

XMiAD was the last of eight small unidentified peaks with elution and absorption characteristics of xanthophylls; the first seven small peaks had concentrations that were 10–50% lower in AD brains (data not shown). XMiAD was intriguing because it was the only analyte whose concentration was higher in AD brains. XMiAD was found in both HE and AD brains but its concentration (estimated from the lutein absorption coefficient) was significantly higher in AD brains (p = 0.006, ANOVA, Table 2). B XMiAD concentration in AD grey matter was significantly higher than that in HE grey matter (p = 0.002, two-tailed T-test) but the difference in white matter was not significant (Fig. 5A). Moreover, AD grey matter had 3.5-fold more XMiAD than HE grey matter, which was significantly larger than the 1.3-fold higher XMiAD in white matter of AD brains (p = 0.007; Fig. 5B).

Fig. 5

A) XMiAD concentration (mean + S.E.) in grey and white matter (dark and light bars, respectively) of HE and AD brains (p = 0.002; ANOVA). B) Relative to HE brains, the fold-increase of XMiAD in AD was greater in grey matter than in white matter (p = 0.007).

XMiAD concentration declined significantly with increasing age in all AD brains (r = –48; p = 0.002) and in grey matter and white matter analyzed separately (Fig. 6). In grey and white matter of both HE and AD brains, XMiAD was significantly correlated with γ-tocopherol as well as retinol and δ-tocopherol, although less strongly (Table 4). XMiAD was correlated with zeaxanthin, anhydrolutein, and β-cryptoxanthin only in white matter of AD brains (Table 4).

Fig. 6

Negative correlation of XMiAD with age of AD brain donors in both grey and white matter (dark and light markers, respectively).

Models to predict disease status

Attempts were made to identify analytes most strongly related to the presence of AD in the brain, though none yielded meaningful results. Due to the large number of analytes compared to the sample size, the generalized linear mixed models were able to identify a combination of the analyte values which perfectly distinguished AD and HE brains. Because this phenomenon violates the assumptions for the linear models, the approach was found to be invalid. Support vector machines designed to find such a linear combination [42] were able to predict disease state with 100% accuracy. However, permutation testing revealed that accurate prediction was still achieved when the labels for disease state were randomly shuffled (p = 0.8). In both cases, the null results are likely due to lack of power because of the small sample size in relation to the number of analytes explored.

Meso-zeaxanthin not detected

The absence of meso-zeaxanthin in the brain is not surprising, as it is rarely detected in human serum except in subjects taking meso-zeaxanthin supplements [63, 64] or eating eggs laid by meso-zeaxanthin supplemented chickens [65]. Other known sources— fish skin, shrimp shells, turtle fat, and vertebrate eyes [66]— are rare dietary components. A small trial found that absorption of lutein, zeaxanthin, and meso-zeaxanthin from a combined supplement was less robust than when the supplement contained equal amounts of lutein and zeaxanthin alone or in combination [63]; this raises the possibilities that meso-zeaxanthin in the diet would be poorly absorbed, and/or that meso-zeaxanthin could interfere with absorption of lutein and zeaxanthin.

Meso-zeaxanthin found in macular pigment is produced by conversion of lutein to meso-zeaxanthin by the enzyme RPE65 in the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE, a monolayer located under the retina) [66]. RPE65 is specifically localized in the RPE where it also plays an essential role in the visual cycle [66]. Zeaxanthin and meso-zeaxanthin are accumulated in macula pigment by binding to GSTP1 (glutathione-S-transferase, pi isoform) where they absorb damaging blue light and synergistically reduce membrane peroxidation [67–69]; the bound meso-zeaxanthin is thus not available for circulation to the brain.

Brain tocopherols and AD risk

The almost 50% lower level of α-tocopherol in grey and white matter and more than 50% lower γ-tocopherol in white matter would have significant effects on brain health, but it is worth noting that even HE brains may have inadequate α- and γ-tocopherol; 60% of Irish community-dwelling seniors had inadequate vitamin E in their diet [70]. Higher dietary intake of α- and γ-tocopherols were independently associated with lower risk for AD in the Chicago Health and Aging Project [71]. Subsequent studies found that higher brain γ-tocopherol (but not α-tocopherol) was associated with lower amyloid load and lower neurofibrillary tangle severity in AD brains [36], higher levels of presynaptic protein and lower levels of activated microglia in the cortex [37, 72]. Risk for AD is associated with dietary tocopherol, predominantly γ-tocopherol [73]; unfortunately, supplementation with α-tocopherol reduces γ-tocopherol in serum [74] and probably brain [36]. γ-Tocopherol— but not α-tocopherol— traps highly reactive oxidant peroxynitrite [75] forming a nitration product (5-nitro-γ-tocopherol) that accumulates in AD brains [76].

Brain carotenoids correlate with cognition

Low brain carotenoid levels would also contribute to functional decline in cognition, which has been linked to lutein and zeaxanthin in diet, plasma, or macular pigment in children [77], older adults [57], and octogenarians and centenarians [39]. Prenatal levels of lutein/zeaxanthin in maternal diets were associated with better verbal intelligence in their offspring [78]. Large population studies with thousands of subjects in the US, France, and Ireland have confirmed higher levels of lutein and zeaxanthin in their diet [43], plasma [52, 56], or macular pigment [58] were associated with higher scores on cognitive tests and higher processing speed.

Carotenoid supplement studies confirm a direct effect of carotenoids on brain function. Improved cognitive performance was observed after 3–18 months supplementation with β-carotene [79], lutein and docosahexaenoic acid [80], lutein and zeaxanthin [81, 82], as well as lutein, meso-zeaxanthin, and zeaxanthin [83, 84]. Supplementation with lutein and zeaxanthin increased visual processing speeds in young adults [85] and altered brain activation patterns in older adults [86, 87].

Carotenoids modulate risk for AD

Risk for diagnosis of AD was higher in those with low dietary intake of total carotenoids or lutein/zeaxanthin, specifically [28]. Moreover, subjects with AD had low plasma or serum levels of carotenoids and tocopherols [44, 88]. Premortem serum levels of carotenoids and tocopherols were significantly correlated with those in temporal but not occipital lobes of donor brains [89]. In the Three-City Bordeaux study, repeated brain imaging of 461 non-demented participants over ten years revealed smaller loss of temporal lobe volume in those with higher plasma total carotenoids [34]. Thus, it is not surprising that each of the carotenoids found low in these AD brains was reported previously to be low in serum or patients with AD (Table 5). In general, analytes that were significantly lower in these AD brains were also low in the MCI brains (Table 5, compare studies 1 and 3). β-carotene was significantly lower in the MCI brains but not in AD brains, and the reverse was true for lycopene. Low lycopene was reported in these AD brains and five studies of AD plasma or sera (Table 5, studies 1, 4,5,7,8,9); lower β-carotene was significant in MCI brains and five AD studies (Table 5, studies 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 13). Curiously, twelve studies reported low lycopene and/or low β-carotene in brains with MCI or serum or plasma of patients with AD, but only two found significantly low levels of both (Table 5, Study 5 and 8). The possible effect of different diets cannot be discounted, but differences in which specific analytes were significantly lower in these small brain studies may disappear (or be affirmed) in larger studies.

Table 5

Comparison of micronutrients associated with AD or MCI in this report and the literature

AD:HE, these data; AD-H, hippocampus; AD-O, Occipital lobe; NC, no change; WM, white matter. Dark cells identify significantly lower analyte concentration, lighter boxes identify analytes that were reported low, but not significant. Open cells indicate an analyte was not detected or not mentioned.

A previous investigation comparing micronutrients in brains with AD and those with normal cognition did not detect a significant difference in carotenoid or tocopherol content of the occipital or hippocampal regions, although AD hippocampal lutein and β-carotene concentration were lower [40]. The absence of significant differences may relate to the small sample size, or the true status of the brains obtained from NDRI, where information about brain health or presence of AD was obtained from the donor or family; brains considered cognitively normal may have had AD pathology and cognitive impairment, and brains considered to have AD may include other forms of dementia. For example, among over 100,000 French patients with early dementia, 40% were attributed to alcohol-related brain damage [90].

A xanthophyll and a carotene were the two most deficient carotenoids in both AD brains (zeaxanthin and lycopene) and MCI brains (lutein and β-carotene). Xanthophyll-carotene pairs act synergistically to prevent lipid oxidation [91]. Moreover, xanthophylls and carotenes modulate different protective signaling pathways. Carotenes and retinoids signal through nuclear receptors RAR/RXR or RAR/PPAR to regulate inflammation, the immune system, as well as axonal and neurite regeneration [92, 93]. Lutein and zeaxanthin activate nuclear-factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf-2) to upregulate phase II protective enzymes such as heme oxygenase-1, superoxide dismutase, peroxiredoxin, and glutathione-S-transferase, pi isoform (GSTPI) [94, 95]. Peroxiredoxin 6 and GSTPI form a complex that repairs peroxidized phospholipids in cell membranes [96, 97]. Zeaxanthin binds to GSTP1, resulting in synergistic protection against membrane lipid peroxidation [68]. Biomarkers of lipoperoxidation are well known in AD and MCI brains [98]; GSTPI variants increase risk for AD [99]. Thus, zeaxanthin may play a unique role in repairing oxidative damage to mitochondria that contributes to neuronal death by apoptosis or ferroptosis [51]. Together these studies suggest that xanthophyll, carotene, and tocopherol antioxidants may play both distinct and overlapping roles in maintaining brain health.

XMIAD, a possible xanthophyll metabolite

XMiAD accumulation in AD brains was an unexpected observation. The absorption spectrum of XMiAD was clearly that of a xanthophyll and it eluted among xanthophylls, but its elution position does not match xanthophylls previously observed in human serum or tissues. Unfortunately, we lacked sufficient sample for further analysis. We propose that it is a xanthophyll metabolite derived from an oxidation event. Oxidized xanthophylls and carotenoids form adducts with a wide range of radicals, forming nitrocarotenoids such as nitrozeaxanthin and nitrolutein (derived from interaction with peroxynitrite) [50, 101–104], 3-methoxyzeaxanthin,identified in human macular pigment [105], as well as sulfonyl and thiyl adducts [106, 107]. The strong positive correlation of XMiAD with γ-tocopherol in both grey and white matter (r = 0.9 and 0.95; Table 4) suggests that levels of both may respond to levels of highly reactive peroxynitrite; a positive correlation could indicate that the reaction producing XMiAD protects gamma-tocopherol. This seems unlikely as carotenoids are less effective than tocopherols in inhibiting lipid peroxidation caused by free radicals [100]. It is more likely that XMiAD is an oxidation-derived adduct protected by γ-tocopherol. Further investigation of this intriguing metabolite is clearly needed.

Previous studies of analytes in healthy brains [39, 40, 89] reported higher analyte concentrations than we found in the healthy elderly brains. After comparing ages of the brains, extraction procedures, and analysis methods, we conclude that the likely explanation for the difference in analyte concentrations is that these AD and HE brains were stored at –80°C for years before the brain samples were analyzed. The observed difference between these AD and HE brains is not related to storage time as both sets were stored for extended times.

Strengths of this small study include confirmation of the presence of AD and absence of pathology by neuropathologists, that HE and AD brains were obtained and analyzed simultaneously, and that data were obtained from both grey and white matter. Limitations include the small sample size, the cross-sectional design, the inability to adjust for other factors known to influence AD (e.g., nutrition, exercise, cardiovascular health, social interactions), and the impossibility to discern whether low analytes contributed to AD, declined with oxidative processes associated with disease progression, or reflect lower dietary intake or absorption of nutrients.

Implications of these data

Given the vulnerability of the brain to oxidative damage, constant generation of reactive species through normal brain functions, and limited antioxidant resources [4, 16], it is reasonable to consider that brains with 40–50% lower levels of α-tocopherol and four carotenoids, and marginally lower levels in three of the four remaining brain carotenoids would be more vulnerable to oxidative damage and inflammation [13]. This new evidence of selective carotenoid and tocopherol deficiencies in the brains of subjects with AD add further support to the growing evidence (recently reviewed by Polidori et al. [4]) that greater dietary intake of lutein, zeaxanthin, lycopene as well as α- and γ-tocopherols may slow cognitive decline prior to— and possibly following— a diagnosis with AD.

Conclusion

In conclusion, we found that concentrations of lycopene, retinol, zeaxanthin, α-tocopherol, anhydrolutein, and lutein were all strikingly lower in brains with confirmed neuropathology characteristic of AD than in HE brains with no evidence of pathology. Meso-zeaxanthin was not detected. Only XMiAD, an unidentified xanthophyll, had significantly higher concentration in AD brains than in HE brains. Further studies are needed to confirm these results in another population and to identify XMiAD.