Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Pereiro, Arturo Xoséa; * | Valladares-Rodríguez, Soniab | Felpete, Albaa | Lojo-Seoane, Cristinaa | Campos-Magdaleno, Maríaa | Mallo, Sabela Carmea | Facal, Davida | Anido-Rifón, Luisb | Belleville, Sylviec; d | Juncos-Rabadán, Onésimoa
Affiliations: [a] Department of Developmental Psychology, University of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain | [b] School of Telecommunication Engineering>, University of Vigo, Vigo, Spain | [c] Research Center of the Institut Universitaire de Gériatrie de Montréal, Montreal, Canada | [d] Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada
Correspondence: [*] Correspondence to: Dr. Arturo X. Pereiro. Department of Developmental Psychology, Xosé María Suárez Núñez Street, Campus Sur. Santiago de Compostela, Galicia ES–15782, Spain. Tel.: +34 881813651; E-mail: arturoxose.pereiro@usc.es.
Abstract: Background:The presence of subjective cognitive complaints (SCCs) is a core criterion for diagnosis of subjective cognitive decline (SCD); however, no standard procedure for distinguishing normative and non-normative SCCs has yet been established. Objective:To determine whether differentiation of participants with SCD according to SCC severity improves the validity of the prediction of progression in SCD and MCI and to explore validity metrics for two extreme thresholds of the distribution in scores in a questionnaire on SCCs. Methods:Two hundred and fifty-three older adults with SCCs participating in the Compostela Aging Study (CompAS) were classified as MCI or SCD at baseline. The participants underwent two follow-up assessments and were classified as cognitively stable or worsened. Severity of SCCs (low and high) in SCD was established by using two different percentiles of the questionnaire score distribution as cut-off points. The validity of these cut-off points for predicting progression using socio-demographic, health, and neuropsychological variables was tested by machine learning (ML) analysis. Results:Severity of SCCs in SCD established considering the 5th percentile as a cut-off point proved to be the best metric for predicting progression. The variables with the main role in conforming the predictive algorithm were those related to memory, cognitive reserve, general health, and the stability of diagnosis over time. Conclusion:Moderate to high complainers showed an increased probability of progression in cognitive decline, suggesting the clinical relevance of standard procedures to determine SCC severity. Our findings highlight the important role of the multimodal ML approach in predicting progression.
Keywords: Cognitive dysfunction, dementia, diagnosis, follow-up studies
DOI: 10.3233/JAD-210334
Journal: Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, vol. 82, no. 3, pp. 1229-1242, 2021
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
sales@iospress.com
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
info@iospress.nl
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office info@iospress.nl
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
china@iospress.cn
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: editorial@iospress.nl