Affiliations: [a] Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| [b]
BC Children’s and Women’s Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada
Correspondence:
[*]
Correspondence to: Julie M. Robillard, PhD, B402 Shaughnessy, 4480 Oak Street, Vancouver, BC V6H 3N1, Canada. Tel.: +1 604 875 3923; E-mail: jrobilla@mail.ubc.ca.
Abstract: Socially assistive robots have the potential to improve aged care by providing assistance through social interaction. While some evidence suggests a positive impact of social robots on measures of well-being, the adoption of robotic technology remains slow. One approach to improve technology adoption is involving all stakeholders in the process of technology development using co-creation methods. To capture relevant stake holders’ priorities and perceptions on the ethics of robotic companions, we conducted an interactive co-creation workshop at the 2019 Geriatric Services Conference in Vancouver, BC. The participants were presented with different portrayals of robotic companions in popular culture and answered questions about perceptions, expectations, and ethical concerns about the implementation of robotic technology. Our results reveal that the most pressing ethical concerns with robotic technology, such as issues related to privacy, are critical potential barriers to technology adoption. We also found that most participants agree on the types of tasks that robots should help with, such as domestic chores, communication, and medication reminders. Activities that robots should not help with, according to the stakeholders, included bathing, toileting, and managing finances. The perspectives that were captured contribute to a preliminary outline of the areas of importance for geriatric care stake holders in the process of ethical technology design and development.
