Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Review Article
Authors: Robillard, Julie M.a; b; * | Wu, Julia M.a; b | Feng, Tanya L.a; b | Tam, Mallorie T.a; b
Affiliations: [a] Department of Medicine, Division of Neurology, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada | [b] BC Women’s and Children’s Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada
Correspondence: [*] Correspondence to: Julie M. Robillard, PhD, B402 – 4480 Oak Street, Vancouver, BC V6 H 3N1, Canada. Tel.: +1 604 875 3923; Fax: 1 604 827 5229; E-mail: jrobilla@mail.ubc.ca.
Abstract: Background:As the global prevalence of dementia rises, care costs impose a large burden on healthcare systems. Technology solutions in dementia care have the potential to ease this burden. While policies exist to guide and govern the use of dementia care technologies, little is known about how ethical considerations are incorporated into these documents. Objective:The goal of this study was to examine ethics-related content in dementia care technology policies. Methods:We used a two-step data mining approach to collect a sample of dementia technology policies. Policy documents were analyzed using emergent content analysis. Following the coding of the sample, thematic categories were organized using the principles of biomedical ethics as a framework. Results:A total of 23 policy documents from four Alzheimer associations in four countries were included in our analysis. General ethics considerations and themes related to beneficence were mentioned in 96% of the documents. Thematic categories related to justice were present in 74% of the sample, themes related to non-maleficence appeared in 52% of documents, and themes related to autonomy appeared in 43% of the sample. Conclusion:While ethical considerations are present in existing policies for dementia care technology, these considerations revolve primarily around the benefit of the technologies. Further efforts are needed to provide formal guidance that incorporates both benefits and potential harms.
Keywords: Dementia, ethics, healthcare, technology
DOI: 10.3233/JAD-180938
Journal: Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, vol. 69, no. 4, pp. 897-904, 2019
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
sales@iospress.com
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
info@iospress.nl
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office info@iospress.nl
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
china@iospress.cn
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: editorial@iospress.nl