Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Burgio, Francescaa; 1 | Delazer, Margareteb; 1 | Meneghello, Francescaa | Pertl, Marie-Theresb | Semenza, Carloa; c | Zamarian, Laurab; *
Affiliations: [a] San Camillo Hospital IRCCS, Venice, Italy | [b] Department of Neurology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Austria | [c] Department of Neuroscience (Padova Neuroscience Center), University of Padua, Italy
Correspondence: [*] Correspondence to: Laura Zamarian, Medical University of Innsbruck, Department of Neurology, Anichstrasse 35, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria. Tel.: +0043 0 512 504 23661; E-mail: laura.zamarian@i-med.ac.at.
Note: [1] These authors contributed equally to this work.
Abstract: Background:Patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) show lower decision making and ratio processing abilities as compared to healthy peers. Objective:To evaluate whether cognitive training on number processing and/or executive functions improves performance on ratio processing and decision making under risk. Methods:In a controlled cross-over study, patients with MCI (n = 23; mean MMSE 26.48, SD 2.43) underwent a week of numerical training followed by a week of executive-functions training (subgroup A), or vice versa (subgroup B). Before training (T1), patients performed experimental tasks of decision making (Game of Dice Task, GDT; Probability-Associated Gambling task, PAG-60 task) and of ratio processing as well as a neuropsychological background assessment. Experimental tasks were also administered after the first (T2) and the second (T3) training week. Results:The numerical training and the training of executive functions had a differential effect on experimental tasks of ratio processing. Only the numerical training proved to be effective. The effects of the two training types on decision making under risk were less clear-cut. While no changes over time were observed in the GDT, performance on the PAG-60 task improved in both training subgroups. These improvements were apparent in one subgroup after a period of executive-functions training, in the other subgroup after both training weeks. That means, improvements are not attributable to one specific training type. Conclusion:Patients with MCI can profit from a cognitive training on number processing and executive functions. Improvements are reflected in higher ratio processing abilities and more advantageous decisions after training. These results are consistent with assumptions of current cognitive models.
Keywords: Executive functions, intervention, medical information, neuropsychology, numerical processing
DOI: 10.3233/JAD-180461
Journal: Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, vol. 64, no. 4, pp. 1213-1226, 2018
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
sales@iospress.com
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
info@iospress.nl
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office info@iospress.nl
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
china@iospress.cn
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: editorial@iospress.nl