Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Sacco, Guillaumea; b; * | Ben-Sadoun, Grégorya | Bourgeois, Jérémya | Fabre, Roxanea | Manera, Valeriaa | Robert, Philippea; b
Affiliations: [a] Université Côte d’Azur, CoBTeK lab IA, France | [b] Université Côte d’Azur, CHU Pôle Réhabilitation Autonomie Vieillissement, CMRR, France
Correspondence: [*] Correspondence to: Guillaume Sacco, SSR post-AVC Hôpital Cimiez, Pavillon Mossa 4ème étage aile Sud, 4 av Reine Victoria, CS 91179, 06003 Nice, France. Tel.: +33 609733254; E-mail: sacco.g@chu-nice.fr.
Abstract: Background:Neuropsychological tests are particularly important for the clinical evaluation and Alzheimer’s disease (AD) diagnosis. However, the tests currently employed for neuropsychological assessment have been developed several decades ago, and thus they do not fully exploit the potential provided by modern digital tools. One of the tests most commonly employed to assess attention and executive functions is the Trail Making Test (TMT). Objective:The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the TMT developed and used for the serious exergame X-Torp (TMTX-Torp) can be used to evaluate cognitive functions such as mental flexibility. Methods:Adjusted multivariate mixed model was used to compare performances in the TMTX-Torp to performances in the standard variant (TMTs) in three populations. 21 participants with AD (78.6y±8.5 y), 27 with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) (76.8y±8.5 y), and 27 healthy (HEC) (71.8y±7.4 y) were included. Results:A difference was observed for the TMT A between AD and HEC and for the TMT B between AD and MCI and between AD and HEC. Whatever the variant of the TMT, we found a positive linear correlation between the time to complete the TMTX-Torp and the TMTs for HEC (TMT A: r = 0.75, p < 0.001; TMT B: r = 0.52, p = 0.008) and MCI participants (TMT A: r = 0.53, p = 0.005; TMT B: r = 0.48, p = 0.025) but not for AD participants. Conclusion:Although these versions of the TMT were not identical, the results showed that both versions were able to discriminate between HEC, MCI, and AD populations.
Keywords: Alzheimer’s disease, executive function, neurocognitive disorders, serious games
DOI: 10.3233/JAD-180396
Journal: Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, vol. 68, no. 4, pp. 1657-1666, 2019
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
sales@iospress.com
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
info@iospress.nl
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office info@iospress.nl
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
china@iospress.cn
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: editorial@iospress.nl