Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Valech, Nataliaa | Tort-Merino, Adriàa | Coll-Padrós, Ninaa; b | Olives, Jaumea | León, Maríaa | Rami, Lorenaa; b; 1 | Molinuevo, José Luisa; b; c; 1; *
Affiliations: [a] Alzheimer’s Disease and Other Cognitive Disorders Unit, Neurology Service, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain | [b] Institut d’ Investigacions Biomèdiques August pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain | [c] Barcelona Beta Brain Research Center, Pasqual Maragall Foundation, Barcelona, Spain
Correspondence: [*] Correspondence to: Dr. José Luis Molinuevo Guix, Alzheimer’s Disease and Other Cognitive Disorders Unit, Neurology Service, Hospital Clinic, Villarroel 170, 08036 Barcelona, Spain. Tel.: +34 932275785; Fax: +34 932 275783; E-mail: jlmoli@clinic.ub.es.
Note: [1] These authors contributed equally to this work.
Abstract: Background:There is a need to specify the profile of subjective cognitive decline in preclinical Alzheimer’s disease (preAD). Objectives:To explore specific items of the Subjective Cognitive Decline Questionnaire (SCD-Q) that discriminate preAD from normal aging. Methods:68 cognitively normal older adults were classified as controls (n = 52) or preAD (n = 16) according to amyloid-β (Aβ) levels. An exploratory factor analysis and item analysis of the SCD-Q were performed. Informant reports of the SCD-Q were used to corroborate the findings of self-reports. One-year neuropsychological follow-up was available. Results:Four SCD-Q factors were extracted: EM-factor (episodic memory), A-factor (attention), O-factor (organization), and L-factor (language). PreAD reported a significantly higher decline in L-factor (F(1) = 6.49; p = 0.014) and A-factor (F(1) = 4.04; p = 0.049) compared to controls, and showed a higher frequency of perceived decline in SCD-Q items related with language and executive tasks (Sig-items.) Significant discriminative powers for Aβ-positivity were found for L-factor (AUC = 0.75; p = 0.003) and A-factor (AUC = 0.74; p = 0.004). Informants in the preAD group confirmed significantly higher scores in L-factor and Sig-items. A significant time×group interaction was found in the Semantic Fluency and Stroop tests, with the preAD group showing a decrease in performance at one-year. Conclusions:Our results suggest that SCD-Q items related with language and executive decline may help in prediction algorithms to detect preAD. Validation in an independent population is needed.
Keywords: Alzheimer’s disease, amyloid-β, biomarkers, preclinical Alzheimer’s disease, subjective cognitive decline
DOI: 10.3233/JAD-170627
Journal: Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, vol. 61, no. 2, pp. 689-703, 2018
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
sales@iospress.com
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
info@iospress.nl
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office info@iospress.nl
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
china@iospress.cn
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: editorial@iospress.nl