Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Radakovic, Ratkoa; b; c; d; e; * | Starr, John M.c; e | Abrahams, Sharona; b; d; e
Affiliations: [a] Department of Psychology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK | [b] Anne Rowling Regenerative Neurology Clinic, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK | [c] Alzheimer Scotland Dementia Research Centre, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK | [d] Euan MacDonald Centre for MND Research, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK | [e] Centre for Cognitive Ageing and Cognitive Epidemiology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
Correspondence: [*] Correspondence to: Ratko Radakovic, University of Edinburgh, Department of Psychology, 7 George Square, Edinburgh, EH8 9JZ, UK. Tel.: +441316511303; E-mails: r.radakovic@ed.ac.uk; radakovic.ratko@gmail.com.
Abstract: Background:Apathy is a complex multidimensional syndrome frequently reported in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and is associated with impaired awareness. Here we present a psychometrically robust method to profile apathy in AD. Objectives:To determine the validity and reliability of a multidimensional apathy measure, the Dimensional Apathy Scale (DAS), and explore the apathy subtype profile and its associations in AD. Methods:102 people with AD and 55 healthy controls were recruited. Participants completed the DAS, the Apathy Evaluation Scale (AES), Geriatric Depression Short form (GDS-15), and Lawton Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (LIADL). Psychometric properties of the DAS were determined. AD-Control comparison was performed to explore group differences on the DAS. Latent Class Analysis (LCA) was used to explore the profile of apathy in AD. Results:The DAS had a good to excellent Cronbach’s standardized alpha (self-rated = 0.85, informant/carer-rated = 0.93) and good convergent and divergent validity against standard apathy (AES) and depression (GDS-15) measures. Group comparison showed people with AD were significantly higher for all apathy subtypes than controls (p < 0.001), and lacking in awareness over all apathy subtype deficits. LCA showed three distinct AD subgroups, with 42.2% in the Executive-Initiation apathy, 28.4% in the Global apathy, and 29.4% in the Minimal apathy group. Conclusions:The DAS is a psychometrically robust method of assessing multidimensional apathy in AD. The apathy profiles in AD are heterogeneous, with additional specific impairments relating to awareness dependent on apathy subtype.
Keywords: Alzheimer’s disease, apathy, awareness, behavior rating scale, psychometrics, syndrome
DOI: 10.3233/JAD-170292
Journal: Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 57-67, 2017
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
sales@iospress.com
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
info@iospress.nl
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office info@iospress.nl
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
china@iospress.cn
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: editorial@iospress.nl