Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Salmerón, Sergioa; * | Huedo, Isabelb | López-Utiel, Melisab | Soler-Moratalla, Isabelb | Flores-Ruano, Teresab | Fernández-Sánchez, Miguelb | Noguerón, Aliciab | Doody, Rachelle S.c | Abizanda, Pedrob
Affiliations: [a] Department of Geriatrics, Hospital General de Villarrobledo, Albacete, Spain | [b] Department of Geriatrics, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Albacete, Albacete, Spain | [c] Department of Neurology and Alzheimer’s Disease and Memory Disorders Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
Correspondence: [*] Correspondence to: Sergio Salmerón, MD, Geriatrics Department, Hospital General de Villarrobledo, Av. Miguel de Cervantes, s/n, 02600 Villarrobledo, Albacete, Spain. Tel.: +34 638567200; Fax: +34 967133038; E-mail: sergiosalmeron@hotmail.com
Abstract: Background:There are no short valid instruments to evaluate cognitive status in severe Alzheimer’s disease (AD) patients in the Spanish language. Objective:To validate the Spanish version of the Baylor Profound Mental Status Examination (BPMSE-Sp). Methods:The Baylor Profound Mental Status Examination (BPMSE) was translated to Spanish and back translated. Validation was conducted in 100 patients with severe probable AD with a Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) <12. We assessed internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha), concurrent validity (Pearson’s correlations) with the MMSE, Severe Impairment Battery (SIB), Neuropsychiatric Inventory Short Form (NPI-Q) and the Functional Assessment Staging and reliability. Results:The mean age of patients was 84.9; 74% were female; 64% were institutionalized. The mean MMSE was 5.6; the mean BPMSE-Sp was 13.6; the mean BPMSE-Sp behavior was 1.2; the mean SIB was 42.2; and the mean NPI-Q was 4.7. BPMSE-Sp presented good internal consistency (Cronbach α= 0.84). There were significant correlations between the BPMSE-Sp and MMSE (r = 0.86, p < 0.001), and between the BPMSE-Sp and SIB (r = 0.92, p < 0.001). Inter-rater and test-retest reliability were in both cases excellent, ranging between 0.96 and 0.99 (p < 0.001). BPMSE-Sp had fewer floor and ceiling effects than the MMSE. Conclusions:The BPMSE-Sp is a valid tool for use in daily practice and research in the evaluation of cognitive function of patients with severe AD.
Keywords: Alzheimer’s disease, Baylor Profound Mental Status Examination, severe dementia, validation
DOI: 10.3233/JAD-150422
Journal: Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 73-78, 2016
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
sales@iospress.com
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
info@iospress.nl
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office info@iospress.nl
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
china@iospress.cn
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: editorial@iospress.nl