Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Bergeron, Davida; * | Beauregard, Jean-Mathieub | Guimond, Jeanc | Fortin, Marie-Pierrea | Houde, Michèlea | Poulin, Stéphanea | Verret, Louisa; d | Bouchard, Rémi W.a; d | Laforce Jr, Roberta; d
Affiliations: [a] Clinique Interdisciplinaire de Mémoire (CIME), CHU de Québec, PQ, Canada | [b] Département d’imagerie médicale, CHU de Québec, PQ, Canada | [c] Service de médecine nucléaire, Institut de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie de Québec (IUCPQ), PQ, Canada | [d] Département des Sciences Neurologiques, Université Laval, PQ, Canada
Correspondence: [*] Correspondence to: David Bergeron, MS, Clinique Interdisciplinaire de Mémoire (CIME), CHU de Québec, 1401, 18ième rue, Québec, G1J 1Z4, Canada. Tel.: +1 418 649 5980; Fax: +1 418 649 5981; E-mail: david.bergeron.5@ulaval.ca
Abstract: Diagnosis of atypical/unclear dementia is often difficult and this delays treatment initiation. Several authors have shown that beyond standard dementia workup, 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) reduces the number of unclear diagnoses, leads to earlier treatment, and has a beneficial impact on families. However, it is not uncommon that the FDG-PET findings are equivocal in this setting. For those cases, a repeat FDG-PET may clarify the diagnosis and prevent treatment delay. We retrospectively assessed the clinical impact of a repeat FDG-PET in 59 patients with atypical/unclear dementia syndromes and inconclusive initial FDG-PET. Changes in primary diagnosis, diagnostic confidence, and management following the second FDG-PET were examined. Conducting a second FDG-PET reduced the number of unclear diagnoses from 80% to 34% , led to diagnostic change in 24% of cases, and treatment modification in 22% of patients. Overall, the clinical impact was higher when initial diagnostic confidence was low and the second FDG-PET repeated ≥12 months after the first one. In tertiary care memory clinic settings, when diagnostic incertitude persists despite extensive evaluation and an equivocal FDG-PET, repeating the FDG-PET 12 months later can greatly clarify the diagnosis and improve management.
Keywords: Atypical dementia, brain imaging, differential diagnosis, FDG-PET
DOI: 10.3233/JAD-150302
Journal: Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 695-705, 2016
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
sales@iospress.com
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
info@iospress.nl
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office info@iospress.nl
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
china@iospress.cn
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: editorial@iospress.nl